Search for: "Arthur Anderson LLP"
Results 1 - 20
of 52
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Poplin (Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP) just filed this brief on my behalf Friday; they drafted it based generally on some thoughts that I'd expressed in this 2021 Tablet article. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
The indictments of Donald Trump have begun to come down. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 7:33 am
These include a former partner in the disgraced auditing firm of Arthur Anderson (the firm that played a key role in the ENRON scandal), Deutsche Bank, and the Chief Financial Officer of the NRA. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 4:11 pm
He worked as Senior Associate at Sanchez & Amador LLP from 2010 to 2011, Senior Associate at Anderson McPharlin & Conners LLP in 2010, and as Senior Associate at Robins Kaplan LLP from 2006 to 2009. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 9:05 pm
Rebecca Barnett, public policy manager for National Association of State Departments of Agriculture (NASDA); Elizabeth Rowland, chief human resource and program officer for NASDA; Blayne Arthur, secretary for NASDA; and Charles Hatcher, commissioner for the Tennessee Department of Agriculture participated in a telephonic conference with Eakin and others from FSIS about a Cooperative Interstate Shipment (CIS) study. [read post]
1 Mar 2021, 11:40 am
See Arthur Anderson LLP v. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 9:58 am
Atrium Med. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 11:24 pm
Arthur Anderson LLP explained, for example, that “judges assessing the validity of restrictive covenants should determine only whether the covenant restrains a party’s ability to compete and, if so, whether one of the statutory exceptions to Section 16600 applies. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 4:25 am
Anderson LaRocca Anderson, 73 N.Y.2d 417, 419 (1989); Credit Alliance Corp. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 2:43 pm
Arthur Anderson LLP, 44 Cal. 4th 937 (2008). [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 7:45 am
Arthur Anderson LLP, 44 Cal. 4th 937 (2008). [read post]
12 Nov 2018, 5:00 am
Arthur Anderson LLP, which generally disapproved of a narrow-restraint exception to Section 16600. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm
The article, penned by lawyers at Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, finds it curious that the courts in Madden didn’t resurrect and apply the VALID-WHEN-MADE doctrine, which even the authors admit has a scant grounding in recent caselaw. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
(Peter Thomas Lane, Schlanger & Schlanger LLP, Pleasantville, N.Y.; Owen Randolph Bragg, Horwitz, Horwitz & Associates, Chicago, IL, on the brief), for Saliha Madden.Thomas Arthur Leghorn (Joseph L. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 9:57 am
(Peter Thomas Lane, Schlanger & Schlanger LLP, Pleasantville, N.Y.; Owen Randolph Bragg, Horwitz, Horwitz & Associates, Chicago, IL, on the brief), for Saliha Madden.Thomas Arthur Leghorn (Joseph L. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
(Peter Thomas Lane, Schlanger & Schlanger LLP, Pleasantville, N.Y.; Owen Randolph Bragg, Horwitz, Horwitz & Associates, Chicago, IL, on the brief), for Saliha Madden.Thomas Arthur Leghorn (Joseph L. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
(Peter Thomas Lane, Schlanger & Schlanger LLP, Pleasantville, N.Y.; Owen Randolph Bragg, Horwitz, Horwitz & Associates, Chicago, IL, on the brief), for Saliha Madden.Thomas Arthur Leghorn (Joseph L. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 11:04 am
Arthur Anderson LLP, which noted that California courts have “consistently affirmed that section 16600 evinces a settled legislative policy in favor of open competition and employee mobility,” because the statute is designed to protect “the important legal right of persons to engage in businesses and occupations of their choosing. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 8:11 am
Arthur Anderson LLP, which noted that California courts have “consistently affirmed that section 16600 evinces a settled legislative policy in favor of open competition and employee mobility,” because the statute is designed to protect “the important legal right of persons to engage in businesses and occupations of their choosing. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
Arthur Anderson LLP, cf. [read post]
