Search for: "Asbestos Claims Management Corporation" Results 61 - 80 of 157
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2009, 2:51 am
When parties in a massive asbestos case agreed to a settlement that would have required The Hartford to pay millions in claims, for example, the lawyers found creative ways to attack it. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 11:27 am by Evan Schwartz
This sparked a nationwide litigation war between corporate polluters and their insurers. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 9:56 pm by Justin Walsh
Anderson represented the Keene Corporation of Rockville Centre on Long Island as it faced millions of dollars of personal-injury claims from power plant workers who said they had been exposed, over many years, to asbestos in thermal insulation. [read post]
19 May 2009, 3:12 pm by Nadia
While some people have claimed that power and money influenced the verdict, Nelson thinks differently. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Therefore, a board is not required to analyze (or require management to analyze) every risk that confronts a company. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm by Korinne Dunn
Section 524(g) currently authorizes bankruptcy courts to enjoin claims against non-debtors if certain requirements are met and only in claims relating to asbestos. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 4:03 am by Walter Olson
Headline stories of the week: Crude for sure: Law.com runs highlights of the tapes of American lawyers stage-managing the Ecuador-Chevron suit [Corporate Counsel, ShopFloor] Why such broad gag orders in Kansas pain-doc advocacy case? [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 9:04 pm by Katelynn Catalano
Department of the Interior released a five-year plan to manage wildfire risk. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 4:18 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  Perhaps even more importantly, “buyers have become more comfortable with the RWI claims process,” as marketplace participants have seen that the insurers “have routinely paid valid claims. [read post]
25 May 2007, 12:55 am
The settlement had been the centerpiece of a prepackaged Chapter 11 petition designed to protect the company from claims arising from its use of asbestos before 1983. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 7:37 pm by Bill Henderson
Miller, Joe Kilpatrick, and Jen Dlugosz, who all specialize in toxic tort and products liability defense work, including the management of large portfolios of asbestos litigation on behalf of some of the world’s largest corporations. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 7:52 pm
  More to the point, many jurisdictions hold that even "free and clear" bankruptcy sales under Bankruptcy Code § 363(f) don't insulate a successor corporation from product liability claims that could have been asserted against its predecessor if applicable state law would hold the successor liable for such claims. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 4:30 am by Steve McConnell
  The court had little difficulty distinguishing the asbestos and OTC cases relied upon by the plaintiffs. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 3:40 am by admin
” Another version:  “Even though SOME kinds of asbestos can cause mesothelioma, the kind of asbestos that was in OUR product does not. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 7:52 pm
  Further, and more to the point, even "free and clear" bankruptcy sales under Bankruptcy Code § 363(f), often don't insulate a successor corporation from product liability claims that could have been asserted against its predecessor. [read post]
22 Jul 2017, 7:59 am by Schachtman
Smith read from an article that invokes a claim that asbestos (with definition as to what mineral) causes ovarian cancer. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 10:43 am by Michael S. Levine and Paul T. Moura
In the transaction, Fluor-1 retained its coal mining and energy operations and transferred its engineering, procurement, construction and project management services to Fluor-2. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 10:16 am
A clash is emerging between the needs and duties of directors and investors to manage risks, and attorneys who advise “don’t ask; don’t tell” to minimize corporate liability in any possible future litigation. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 2:30 am by Jon L. Gelman
The Exclusivity Doctrine bars an employee from filing a claim against his or her employer outside of workers' compensation. [read post]