Search for: "Asbestos Corporation Limited " Results 61 - 80 of 366
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2020, 7:27 am by Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
“It could be something as minor as the mere fact that two claims were filed against the same corporate defendant. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 9:02 pm by Jim Sedor
Before Robert Mueller’s probe, few were even aware of this insider economy of lawyers, lobbyists, and consultants representing foreign officials, corporations, and political parties. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 7:18 am by Jon L. Gelman
Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, 493 F. 2d 1076 - Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit 1973. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 6:13 pm by Apsosredesign
Currently, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) states the permissible exposure limit (PEL) for asbestos in air is .1 fiber per cubic centimeter over an eight-hour period. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 11:28 am by Adam Levitin
There are only a few fraud-based exceptions to the Chapter 11 discharge for corporate entities. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 5:47 am
Occupational Asbestos Exposure Asbestos Screening Contact Environmental Litigation Group Today, asbestos continues to be used in gaskets, friction products, roofing materials, and in a limited number of industrial settings, such as for filtering chemicals. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 10:37 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Robins and the Dalkon shield cases, or the Manville Corporation asbestos cases). [read post]
8 Sep 2019, 4:33 pm by Joseph Koncelik
Sugar, 2016 Ohio 884- shareholder personally liable for failure to correctly remove and dispose of asbestos; State ex rel. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 3:28 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Regarding the asbestos packing material, the Court found that the plaintiff’s testimony about what the material looked like combined with testimony from a corporate representative that most of their customers bought the cheaper, asbestos-containing product was sufficient as to the claim against that company. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 11:00 am by Neil Schoenherr
Louis, Arch City Defenders and Dutchtown South Community Corporation. [read post]
4 Jul 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
In April, EPA finalized a rule that limited use of asbestos but also included reporting exemptions for naturally-occurring asbestos and asbestos-containing products. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 7:40 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Mesothelioma, for example, has a latency period of 30-40 years between exposure to asbestos and cancer diagnosis. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 6:08 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
  Stated otherwise, the Asbestos Products Liability Litigation case appears to lay down a bright line test that limits jurisdiction in Pennsylvania to those corporations who have a principal place of business in Pennsylvania or which are incorporated in the state of Pennsylvania.Anyone wishing to review this In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (No. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
Listening, I was struck by the limits of this vision. [read post]
29 May 2019, 5:40 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Proving liability means building a case against some of the nation’s largest corporations for exposure that often happened decades ago. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:18 am by Schachtman
Evidence that the Maritime Commission had warned Bethlehem Steel about the hazards of asbestosis, and to maintain a threshold limit value of 5 million particles per cubic foot, was not particularly germane or helpful in avoiding mesothelioma among employees. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 6:22 am by Simmons Hanly Conroy
One of the bills Murt will reconsider limits the ability of asbestos victims to sue. [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Actavis Group PTC EHF & Ors v ICOS Corporation & Anor, heard 19-20 Nov 2018. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 6:41 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Meanwhile, in the United States, legal liability has done as much or more to limit use of asbestos than the patchwork of current and failed regulations. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 3:49 pm by Foran & Foran, P.A.
  The court went on to find that, even if the defendant had warned the decedent’s husband of asbestos exposure, there was no evidence demonstrating how the warning would have been effective in limiting the decedent’s exposure. [read post]