Search for: "Asbestos Corporation Limited "
Results 81 - 100
of 368
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2019, 5:47 am
Occupational Asbestos Exposure Asbestos Screening Contact Environmental Litigation Group Today, asbestos continues to be used in gaskets, friction products, roofing materials, and in a limited number of industrial settings, such as for filtering chemicals. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
was of course correct on this limited point, but generally in this field, peer review is worth a warm bucket of spit. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 7:28 pm
In Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Macdonald (No 11) [2009] NSWSC 287 the New South Wales Supreme Court has decided in favour of ASIC's civil claim that a number of statements in the Draft ASX Announcement by James Hardie to the effect that the Foundation would have sufficient funds to meet all legitimate Asbestos Claims, that it was fully funded and provided certainty for people with legitimate Asbestos Claims were false or misleading and that… [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 7:28 pm
Department of Labor's Occupational Safety and Health Administration's sampling results determined 14 workers had lead levels up to 20 times the exposure limit. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 11:44 am
Along with the provisions intended to limit the ability of individuals to recover damages, the action also requires trusts that administer payments to asbestos victims to publish the names and addresses of these recipients on a quarterly basis. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 11:44 am
Along with the provisions intended to limit the ability of individuals to recover damages, the action also requires trusts that administer payments to asbestos victims to publish the names and addresses of these recipients on a quarterly basis. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 11:44 am
Along with the provisions intended to limit the ability of individuals to recover damages, the action also requires trusts that administer payments to asbestos victims to publish the names and addresses of these recipients on a quarterly basis. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:14 pm
Mallory sued the railroad in a state court in Pennsylvania, seeking to hold the company liable for his exposure to asbestos and other toxic chemicals that he says caused his cancer. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 8:50 am
., asbestos, talc, benzene, Roundup). [read post]
3 May 2017, 11:30 am
The bill also seeks to limit the ability of plaintiffs to receive compensation from multiple companies or asbestos trusts. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 3:13 am
Soon the compensation system with its limited administrative resources and its limited benefits gave way to the use of the civil justice system for direct actions against asbestos manufacturers, suppliers and health research organizations. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 7:54 am
Beyond that, we don’t know what to expect, except we know one thing for sure: there’s no limit to the imagination of corporate miscreants when it comes to finding new ways to immunize themselves from civil and criminal wrongdoing. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 3:18 am
This isn’t entirely breaking news; six months ago the Fourth Circuit reinstated the case over statute of limitations defenses, reported about here by the anti-consumer folks at Forbes. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 6:56 am
Johns-Mansville Products Corporation.[1] Without a record of what was known or knowable, the New Jersey Supreme Court held that defendants that sold asbestos-containing products without warning of the products’ latent hazards would be liable even when the hazards were “undiscoverable” at the time of marketing.[2] This holding was based upon a trial court record devoid of the state-of-art defense. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 9:15 am
The Brodeur version of asbestos history is easy to spin and sell to jurors when the court limits or excludes the role of the dominant player in the tragedy — the U.S. government. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 8:07 pm
Throughout history we have seen this happen with asbestos, defective cars & drugs. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 3:28 am
Regarding the asbestos packing material, the Court found that the plaintiff’s testimony about what the material looked like combined with testimony from a corporate representative that most of their customers bought the cheaper, asbestos-containing product was sufficient as to the claim against that company. [read post]
2 May 2010, 8:30 am
However, in most cases the one-year limit applies. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:09 am
In 1986, Manhattan federal bankruptcy court issued a landmark reorganization plan that discharged Johns-Manville Corporation and its indemnity insurers from future asbestos-related liability (“Manville Confirmation Order”). [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:09 am
In 1986, Manhattan federal bankruptcy court issued a landmark reorganization plan that discharged Johns-Manville Corporation and its indemnity insurers from future asbestos-related liability (“Manville Confirmation Order”). [read post]
