Search for: "Asbestos Products Liability, et al, et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 105
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
Selikoff perpetuated a good deal of mischief and misinformation to keep his myth that all fiber types are the same (and that “asbestos is asbestos is asbestos”). [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 6:07 pm
Asbestos litigation existed as workman’s compensation cases from the 1930s, and as occasional, isolated cases against manufacturers, from the late 1950s.[1] By 1970, federal regulation of asbestos, in both occupational and environmental settings, however, helped create a legal perpetual motion machine that is still running, half a century later. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 4:16 pm
The MDL is larger than the asbestos and talc product cases. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm
INTRODUCTION The new, third edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence was released to the public in September 2011, as a joint production of the National Academies of Science, and the Federal Judicial Center. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 2:00 am
North American Polymer Company, Ltd., et al, 2020 IL App (1st) 192619 (Dec. 3, 2020). [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
This theory of liability, not utilized in asbestos litigation, is currently being asserted in COVID claims. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 7:14 am
Torts — Asbestos exposure — Weight of evidence Christopher Coates filed a lawsuit against Ford Motor Company, the appellee, alleging negligence and strict liability failure to warn about the presence of asbestos in products supplied to Coates employer. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 2:00 am
Krumwiede, et al. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 10:11 am
Canna Brand Solutions LLC et al., plaintiff began using a number of cannabis vapor products in January 2018, and continued use through September 2019. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 7:36 am
Autozone Northeast, Inc., et al., Civ. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 9:05 am
Rev. 983 (2005); Chris Michael Temple, “A Case for Why Silica Litigation Is Not the ‘Next Asbestos’,” Product Liab. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 7:04 am
Torts — Asbestos liability — Appeal of compelled discovery disclosures This appeal arises out of an asbestos products liability action filed by the legal heirs of Ronald Valentine (“appellees”) against Union Carbide Corporation (“appellant”) in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 8:00 am
Precision Airmotive Corporation, et al., No. 17-3006 (U.S. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 7:43 pm
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Nos. 16-11051, et al., 2018 U.S. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 11:22 am
However, this ignores the fact that ascertaining liability in asbestos lawsuits is no easy feat, given the latency of the disease and the fact that exposure occurred many decades earlier and that asbestos was used for so many products and materials. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 11:22 am
However, this ignores the fact that ascertaining liability in asbestos lawsuits is no easy feat, given the latency of the disease and the fact that exposure occurred many decades earlier and that asbestos was used for so many products and materials. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 9:01 am
Fertilizer Asbestos Wrongful Death Claims Revived Plaintiff alleged liability against fertilizer manufacturer for breach of warranties, marketing of an ultra-hazardous product, breach of non-delegable duty to warn and civil conspiracy. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 5:00 am
John Crane, Inc., et al., No. 2837 EDA 2017 (Pa.Super. [read post]
27 Jan 2018, 8:50 am
., et al., Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, July Term 1982, No. 1619. [read post]
