Search for: "Assignment of Cases v."
Results 21 - 40
of 14,583
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2007, 5:49 pm
(September 28, 2007), the Federal Circuit reiterated that an agreement to assign did not transfer rights sufficient to support standing to sue for patent infringement:Reviewing Federal Circuit authority, the court concluded that this case is akin to the agreements in FilmTec Corp. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 11:58 am
The case is Comerica Bank & Trust v. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 4:15 am
The CAFC, on jurisdictional grounds, does not resolve the assignment issues in Larson v. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:02 am
In another recent real estate case from the Appeals Court of Massachusetts dealing with mortgage foreclosure, Hoyt v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 9:11 am
This Kat was perusing the excellent IPDraughts blog the other day, and read this report of an interesting case Wright Hassall LLP v Horton Jr & Anor [2015] EWHC 3716 (QB), which is a bit of an oddity - it is basically a solicitor negligence case, brought about by the solicitor claiming for unpaid fees, and the client counterclaiming for negligence. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 3:15 am
A 2010 case out of New York illustrates that an assignment of litigation rights may or may not constitute champerty depending on the intent of the parties to the assignment agreement - at least in cases where the assignment is to attorneys who are bringing the lawsuit on behalf of the assignor. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 5:37 am
MALIBU MEDIA, LLC v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 5:45 am
Malibu Media, LLC v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 12:16 pm
The case is, Nautilus Insurance Company, et al. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 11:30 am
That case is Piranha Partners et al v. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 6:45 am
Miller v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:39 pm
CSB-System Int’l., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 10:11 am
While at first glance one might believe the cases of Chames v. [read post]
Agreement to assign to employer requires separate assignment; dismissal for lack of standing vacated
1 Oct 2007, 2:35 pm
More detail of IpVenture, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 7:00 am
Misc. 1894) (a collusive divorce case), Hood v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 7:41 pm
Stanford v Roche 2008-1509, -1510 (Fed. [read post]
7 May 2013, 5:41 pm
In Revolutionary Concepts, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 8:26 am
No. 1 v. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 7:18 am
The case involved a water damage […] [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 7:10 pm
Whitewater West Indus. v. [read post]
