Search for: "Austin v. Austin et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 348
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
Another multi-district litigation (MDL) has hit a jarring speed bump. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:14 am
Facts: This case (Nelson v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 1:45 pm
McCraw, Director, Texas Department Of Public Safety, et al. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:10 pm
The case is Gates v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 2:42 pm
Bambauer, Saura Masconale, et. al., Reckless Associations, 36 Harv. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
Dec. 6, 2022); see also Horwin v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 3:27 am
The Austin Court of Appeals has ruled in Texas Railroad Commission et al v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
Uni- versity of North Carolina et al., on certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
Uni- versity of North Carolina et al., on certiorari before judgment to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. [read post]
11 May 2023, 5:01 am
Legal Arguments in the Texas Suit In their motion for summary judgment, plaintiffs in Joseph Van Loon et al. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 10:54 am
Genotox Laboratories, Ltd., et al., No. 2:20-cv-97 (S.D. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:27 pm
Williamson, et al., 1 Bankrupt. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 1:01 pm
Microsoft asks the court to adjudge its motion to dismiss regardless of any commitments not to close the deal before a given date.Here's Microsoft's motion, filed late Tuesday afternoon Pacific Time:De Martini et al. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 5:32 am
Stross v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 8:00 am
Swedish Covenant Hospital, et al., No. 20-cv-05534. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Malapportionment is also associated with disparate allocation of government resources in favor of overrepresented areas (Baker and Dinkin 1997; Ansolabehere et al. 2002; Horiuchi and Saito 2003; Gibson et al. 2004; Bruhn et al. 2010; Maaser and Stratmann 2016) and less progressive tax structures that reinforce economic inequality (Ardanaz and Scartascini 2013). [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
A second follow-up case, Steinmetz et al v Germany, was filed in 2022. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:24 pm
Edward K. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am
For example, he raises and explains the problem encountered for causal inference by small relative risks: “Small relative risks of the order of 2:1 or even less are what are likely to be observed, like the risk now recorded for childhood leukemia and exposure to magnetic fields of 0.4 µT or more (Ahlbom et al. 2000) that are seldom encountered in the United Kingdom. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
Ever since the United States Supreme Court decided Daubert v. [read post]
