Search for: "Austin v. Austin et al" Results 41 - 60 of 350
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2020, 12:42 pm by fjhinojosa
Beyer et al., The Fine Art of Intimidating Disgruntled Beneficiaries with In Terrorem Clauses, 51 SMU L. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm by Chris Castle
[This is a version of a letter I sent to the Senate Subcommittee on Intellectual Property today to call attention to various discrepancies in the proposed witness list, especially the presence of the Pirate Party at a hearing at the world’s greatest deliberative body. [read post]
23 Jan 2020, 10:37 pm by Schachtman
All the parties’ epidemiology witnesses invoked Sir Austin Bradford Hill’s viewpoints or factors for judging whether associations were causal.[15] Although they embraced Hill’s viewpoints on causation, the plaintiffs’ epidemiologic expert witnesses had a much more difficult time faithfully applying them to the evidence at hand. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 2:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Lucas Nanny, et al., 13 C 1260 SMY (In the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois). [read post]
4 Dec 2019, 1:10 pm by sydniemery
Zetzsche et. al., The Ico Gold Rush: It’s A Scam, It’s A Bubble, It’s A Super Challenge for Regulators, 60 Harv. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 6:45 am by Joe Wojciechowski
GPB Capital Holdings, et al., Case No. 19-cv-01079, alleged civil conspiracy, fraud, and violations of various securities laws. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  The City of Austin, incidentally, after losing its case, was required to pay some $8000 in lawyers’ fees to the ACLU; no doubt the City Council viewed this as simply a cost of reassuring most Austinites that it was no friend of the Klan. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Butler are both associated with the law firm of Spiros Law, P.C. in Kankakee, Ill.Peyton Heathcoat, et al. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
A 2019 epidemiological study has revealed that 9.2% of cattle and 18.2% of beef contain the pathogen.[2] Another recent study has estimated that the Gram-negative bacteria is present in up to 16% of North American cattle.[3] In a 2007 study by Stephens et al., Salmonella was isolated from all of the animals sampled, while Escherichia coli O157:H7 was only isolated from 42.5% of the animals.[4] Notably, 94% of oral cavity samples, 94% of hock samples, 88% of perineum samples, 86% of… [read post]