Search for: "AutoZone, Inc." Results 101 - 120 of 121
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2011, 4:29 am by Marie Louise
Falk (Property, intangible) TTAB affirms mere descriptiveness refusal of “A BRAND NAME LAW FIRM,” finding double entendre argument unappealing (TTABlog) Fame propels AUTOZONE to TTAB 2(d) victory in DENT ZONE cancellation: AutoZone Parts v Dent Zone Companies (TTABlog) TTAB affirms genericness refusal of FIREPOT for … guess what? [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Rogers Group, Inc. , 548 So. 2d 740, 741 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989) (finding construction laborer’s injuries arising from personal lunch debt was compensable as employment placed construction workers in close proximity, combatants’ relationship originated at work, and wood used in altercation was implement of employment); Sentry Ins. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 12:19 pm by Richard Hunt
AutoZone, Inc., 2019 WL 1245143, at *4 (N.D. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 11:02 am by Russell Knight
Autozone, Inc., 745 NE 2d 687 – Ill: Appellate Court, 3rd Dist. 2001 The employer penalty is limited in that you can only look back one year to penalize a non-compliant employer for failure to deduct and deliver child support. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]