Search for: "Avaya, Inc." Results 1 - 20 of 54
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2022, 3:24 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Contrary to the court’s determination, however, JB failed to establish that the doctrine of judicial estoppel applies with respect to NACH or Alf, because JB failed to establish as a matter of law that NACH or Alf, as non-debtors, were in privity with NAC (see In re Avaya Inc., 573 BR 93, 103-104 [SD NY 2017]). [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 10:35 am by Chris Wesner
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS In re: : Chapter 11 : Murray Metallurgical Coal : Case No. 20-10390 Holdings, LLC, et al., : : Judge Hoffman : Debtors [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 9:13 pm by Patent Docs
Namely, Samsung Electronics as well as a number of other companies (Cisco Systems, Avaya, LG Electronics, Toshiba Corp., VIZIO, Hulu, and Verizon) appealed from final written decisions of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in inter partes review proceedings of U.S. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 12:07 pm
Indianapolis, Indiana - Patent attorneys for Plaintiff Interactive Intelligence, Inc. of Indianapolis, Indiana filed a lawsuit for declaratory judgment in the Southern District of Indiana against Defendant Avaya, Inc. of Santa Clara, California. [read post]
4 Aug 2016, 12:07 pm
Indianapolis, Indiana - Patent attorneys for Plaintiff Interactive Intelligence, Inc. of Indianapolis, Indiana filed a lawsuit for declaratory judgment in the Southern District of Indiana against Defendant Avaya, Inc. of Santa Clara, California. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Puerto Rico 2014http://t.co/0yAUYfpV39 -> License restrictions not binding in customers where not given to them Avaya, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
Puerto Rico 2014http://t.co/0yAUYfpV39 -> License restrictions not binding in customers where not given to them Avaya, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 4:48 am by Submitted Posting
Legal Director and Corporate Counsel Avaya, Inc Register for the free Protecting Your Brand in Social Media webinar today. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 2:47 pm by Joel Zand
VirnetX accused four companies of patent infringement in the lawsuit that it reached a verdict against the Cupertino company yesterday: Apple, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Avaya, Inc., and German-based Siemens Enterprise Communications GmbH. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 2:47 pm by Joel Zand
VirnetX accused four companies of patent infringement in the lawsuit that it reached a verdict against the Cupertino company yesterday: Apple, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Avaya, Inc., and German-based Siemens Enterprise Communications GmbH. [read post]