Search for: "B Ware"
Results 61 - 80
of 280
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2019, 2:57 am
[This guest post was written by Amanda B. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 10:12 am
It clearly describes a prominent characteristic of the wares or services provided. [read post]
21 Oct 2007, 9:22 am
" Lieutenant General Mattis also referred charges against LCpl Stephen B. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 10:07 am
The valuables can be anything from money, goods, wares and chattel to rent or labor. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 7:37 am
Research in Motion Limited, et. al., 5-08-cv-04990 (CAND December 19, 2011, Order) (Ware, J.) [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 6:41 am
This is Plan B. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 9:17 am
Those criteria are as follows: a. that there is a serious issue to be tried; b. that the moving party will suffer irreparable harm if the injunction is not granted; and c. that the balance of convenience favours the granting of the injunction. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 9:35 am
To come within the prohibition under section 12 (1) (b), the trademark must initially be found to be descriptive and then be found to mislead the public as to the character of the quality of the wares. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 3:55 pm
b. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 1:28 pm
A second offense is a Class B misdemeanor (up to 180 days in jail and maximum fine of $2000) and a third offense is a Class A misdemeanor (up to one year in jail and maximum fine of $4000). [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 10:23 am
B. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 9:50 am
., Feb. 16, 2012) (Ware, J.). [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:02 am
So no surprise that when Red Bull found another energy drink manufacturer selling its wares under the BIGHORN trade mark using signs that bore a certain similarity to Red Bull logos - in one of the three instances pleaded, charging rams rather than charging bulls - they sued for trade mark infringement on grounds of likelihood of confusion (the rams obviously meaning that the defendant's trade mark could not be identical) and unfair advantage (without due cause, of course).The deputy… [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 11:02 am
So no surprise that when Red Bull found another energy drink manufacturer selling its wares under the BIGHORN trade mark using signs that bore a certain similarity to Red Bull logos - in one of the three instances pleaded, charging rams rather than charging bulls - they sued for trade mark infringement on grounds of likelihood of confusion (the rams obviously meaning that the defendant's trade mark could not be identical) and unfair advantage (without due cause, of course).The deputy… [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 8:12 am
§ 1401a(b)(2)(B). [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 9:31 am
Also, be ware that there are different versions of Permissive and Copyleft licenses so the terms and conditions of the licenses can vary within each type of license. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 2:45 pm
District Judge Samuel B. [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 3:42 pm
§6901, establishes a rebuttable presumption that any goods, wares, articles, and merchandise mined, produced, or manufactured wholly or in part in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region of the People’s Republic of China, where the U.S. government says China is committing genocide against the Uyghur people, or produced by an entity on a list required by clause (i), (ii), (iv) or (v) of section 2(d)(2)(B) are prohibited under section 307 of the Tariff Act of 1930 are not… [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 8:41 pm
Section 7(b) of the Canadian Trade-marks Act provides that no person shall “direct public attention to his wares, services or business in such a way as to cause or be likely to cause confusion in Canada, at the time he commenced so to direct attention to them, between his wares, services or business and the wares, services or business of another. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 9:23 am
However, BMW’s claim of passing-off contrary to section 7(b), was successful. [read post]
