Search for: "B. MARSH" Results 1 - 20 of 283
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2024, 7:30 pm by Ben Allen
The District Court denied his motion, and Marsh proceeded to trial, where a jury convicted him of six of the seven charged listed in his Indictment.Prior to his sentencing, Marsh objected to three enhancements in his PSR, which increased his based offense level by 10: (a)  (1) a § 2K2.1(b)(1)(B) enhancement because the offense involved between eight and twenty-four firearms; (2) a § 2K2.1(b)(4)(A) enhancement because the offense involved… [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm by Daphne Keller
  This is the second in a hopefully finite series of blog posts about the legal issues in the NetChoice cases, in which platforms raise First Amendment challenges to social media laws in Texas and Florida. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:35 am by fjhinojosa
Marsh at Twenty-Two: The Military Chaplaincy and the Separation of Church and State is cited in the following book: W. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:08 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Chronology of events A common hypothetical of the issues that arise when multiple injuries are sustained over a course of a career might be a professional football player named Joe Quarterback, with the following chronology of industrial injuries: 2009: Joe begins his career as a pro football quarterback 2010: Joe sustains a brain injury 2018: Joe sustains a spine injury 2019: Joe retires from pro ball 2021: Joe files a workers’ comp claim/Application for a CT ending 2019 B. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 9:07 am by Bob Ambrogi
Tech-powered litigation, featuring Darth Vaughn, managing director of legalops and litigation counsel at Ford Motor Company, Subroto Mukerji, CEO of Integreon, and Farrah Pepper, chief legal innovation counsel at Marsh McLennan, and moderated by Kevin Clem, chief growth officer at Harbor. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 4:56 am by Guest Author
The law known as the “Little” Tucker Act authorizes federal district courts to entertain small dollar civil claims against the United States, “in cases not sounding in tort. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by admin
Marsh, “Separating the good guys and gals from the bad,” 126 Br. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 2:30 am by Seán Binder
Marianna Sotomayor, Leigh Ann Caldwell, Amy B Wang, and Paul Kane report for the Washington Post. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 10:06 pm by Jeff Gittins
A temporary water shortage emergency could only be declared if an interruption of water delivery “caused by manmade or natural causes other than drought” either (a) threatens the “availability or quality of an essential water supply or water supply infrastructure” or (b) threatens the operation of the economy and “jeopardizes the peace, health, safety, or welfare” of the public. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 8:43 am by Mitchell Stabbe
  In 2022, its total revenue was $1.14 B and 85-90% of that came from the men’s tournament. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 3:23 pm by Maggie Pahl
The Act was designed to balance environmental and economic interests.[20] The New York State regulatory process prior to the 2022 amendment left many wetlands, including marshes, swamps, bogs, and wet meadows, unprotected by New York State law.[21] A 1990 amendment increased coverage in some discreet locations that voluntarily opted to implement more stringent requirements.[22] However, this commitment was far from universal across the state. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 7:01 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Anatomy of a Restrictive Covenant View the Recording In the fourth installment of the 2022 webinar series, Seyfarth attorneys Kate Perrelli, Matt Simmons, and Robyn Marsh discussed restrictive covenant agreements (“RCAs”), including non-competes, non-solicitations, and NDAs. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 3:52 am by Emma Snell
 Ella Nilsen and René Marsh report for CNN. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
 Pix Credit here The jurisprudence of the Religion Clauses in the United States has long been plagued by the doctrine that distinguishes between governmental speech and private speech. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 2:31 pm by Russell Knight
” 750 ILCS 5/602.7(b) “The court shall allocate parenting time according to the child’s best interests. [read post]