Search for: "B. Sullivan"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2020, 1:30 am
Malik and Religious Freedom: The Influence of Biography on Malik’s Contributions to the Drafting of the Universal Declaration of Human RightsAoife Daly & Catherine O’Sullivan, Sexuality Education and International Standards: Insisting Upon Children’s RightsLorenza B. [read post]
13 May 2020, 11:03 am
Harper, a prosecutor with the Sullivan County District Attorney’s Office, said his office was discussing whether to appeal the decision to the State Supreme Court... [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 10:00 pm
No automatic right to appeal B. [read post]
4 May 2011, 6:00 am
Recently FINRA adopted a number of changes to this new rule and our friends at Sullivan & Cromwell sent along this brief memo summarizing them. [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP has represented the defendants throughout this 13-year litigation. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 2:44 pm
The FTC clearly took the lead and won a preliminary injunction under the more lenient standard under 13(b) of the FTC Act. [read post]
27 May 2009, 11:28 am
Judge Sullivan wrote for the majority.ACCA reasoned: "Rule for Court-Martial 1001(b)(4) has a 'rather broad ambit.' United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 11:18 am
Shepard, C.J., and Sullivan and Boehm, JJ., concur. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
B. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 6:41 am
" Plaintiffs win under Rule 60(b)(6). [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 12:37 pm
., d/b/a Aquasource v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
”[15] Material interference may be proven through several methods, such as: (i) inference from an entity’s intent to interfere, (ii) evidence that the “natural consequence” of the act or omission is interference, or (iii) evidence that the act or omission in fact interfered with a consumer’s understanding.[16] Furthermore, “it may be reasonable to presume” material interference if certain “consequential” transaction terms, such as pricing,… [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 8:39 pm
B said: you mean Rossini. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 9:58 am
Shepard, C.J., and Sullivan and Rucker, JJ., concur. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 4:20 am
Sullivan was an appeal from the settlement of an antitrust class action that had been certified under Rule 23(b)(3) for damages relief and under Rule 23(b)(2) for injunctive relief. [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 4:10 am
Sullivan as Historical Analogue, (Florida International University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 22-03 (2022).From SmartCILP and elsewhere:Thomas E. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 9:45 am
§§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(B). [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 5:11 pm
The Faculty includes: Chair: Ben B. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 3:57 pm
”For presiding Judge Sullivan’s (above right) – pointed – views on these latest developments, see his order here.Image of the Honorable William Fletcher from http://www.law.gonzaga.edu/news-and-events/Files/quackenbush/fletcher.jpg Image of the Honorable Judge Emmet Sullivan from http://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/dcd/sullivan Image of ratchet from http://s7.sears.com/is/image/Sears/00944977000-1Steven Kalar, Senior Litigator N.D. [read post]
17 May 2016, 6:48 am
§ 53(b), seeking to enjoin the parties from effectuating the transaction until the FTC has the opportunity to challenge the merger at an administrative proceeding. [read post]
