Search for: "B.L. "
Results 1 - 20
of 150
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
B.L., the Court held that a high school violated the First Amendment when it suspended a cheerleader from the cheer team on account of the student’s having posted (from her personal phone, outside of school grounds and school hours) an online screed on Snapchat, viewable only by her Snapchat friends, that used profanity to criticize the school and the school’s cheerleading squad. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 8:55 pm
B.L., Austin v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 4:05 pm
B.L., Austin v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
B.L., a public high school student transmitted to her Snapchat friends vulgar language and gestures criticizing the school and its cheerleading team after she did not make the varsity squad. [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 9:38 am
B.L. (2021). [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:35 am
B.L., the 2021 case in which the Court ruled in favor of a cheerleader who was disciplined for her derogatory Snapchat posts, is highly relevant, even though it was not cited in any of the briefs in either case by the petitioners, respondents, or SG as amicus. [read post]
26 Oct 2023, 7:01 am
B.L., and People v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 5:47 am
See B.L. v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 4:30 am
B.L. in 2021. [read post]
16 May 2023, 7:50 am
B.L. was now back in J.L. [read post]
2 May 2023, 7:23 am
From The Satanic Temple, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 12:39 pm
On March 1, 2023, students, faculty, librarians and administrative staff members got together to discuss B.L. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 7:39 pm
B.L. (2021). [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 6:03 am
From B.L. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 3:08 pm
B.L. ex rel. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 11:57 am
B.L. (2021). [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 12:40 pm
B.L., a recent Supreme Court case that protected a student from suspension after she posted a picture to Snapchat with the caption “fuck cheer. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 12:23 pm
B.L., also known as the cursing cheerleader case, the court considered whether public schools can constitutionally punish students’ off-campus speech. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 7:15 pm
B.L., the court said in part:Because CCHS cannot stand in loco parentis and the Complaint alleges no reasonable forecast of substantial disruption or actual disruption, Plaintiff has properly alleged that Defendants’ discipline of C.G. for his off-campus speech is a First Amendment violation that cannot be dismissed at this stage.Reuters reports on the decision. [read post]
