Search for: "BAYER PHARMACEUTICALS CORP." Results 1 - 20 of 171
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2022, 9:40 am by Holman
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., Case No. 17-cv-04405-HSG, Document 565, July 22,2021 (N.D. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Related blog posts: Illinois Appellate Court Finds That Physician and Pharmacy Have No Duty to Warn of Medical Risks Associated With Long-Term Use of Reglan State Supreme Court Affirms Dismissal of Lawsuit Against Bayer Corp. for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction U.S. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 12:39 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The directors’ and officers’ liability environment is always changing, but 2021 was a particularly eventful year, with important consequences for the D&O insurance marketplace. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 8:10 pm by Patent Docs
Companies declining included Bristol-Myers Squibb, 7.9%; Pfizer, 6.9%; and Bayer AG 4.9%. [read post]
14 May 2019, 11:24 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Cir. 2014)(quoting Alza Corp. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2018, 12:12 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Bayer Corp., G053847, 2018 WL 4275356, --- Cal.Rptr.3d ---- (Ct. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Related blog posts: State Supreme Court Affirms Dismissal of Lawsuit Against Bayer Corp. for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
Related blog posts: State Supreme Court Affirms Dismissal of Lawsuit Against Bayer Corp. for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction U.S. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 8:15 am by Kelly Hyman
“Each of these lawsuits arise from the injuries Plaintiff sustained after being implanted with Essure, which is a permanent birth control device that is manufactured and distributed by Bayer by Bayer Corp., Bayer HealthCare LLC, Bayer Essure Inc., Conceptus Inc., Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, and Bayer A.G., the Plaintiff’s petition stated. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp., ___ P.3d ___, 2016 WL 237777, at *5 (Ariz. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:42 am
  Sorrell, of course, held that pharmaceutical promotion was First Amendment protected speech, as we discussed here. [read post]