Search for: "BENEFICIAL MAINE, INC."
Results 141 - 157
of 157
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Many of the citations deal with eminently practical matters, but the courts have also thought it beneficial to call upon the philosophers for a variety of more strictly “philosophic” notions, for example, Thomas Aquinas on the doctrine of free will, and Bertrand Russell on logical constructions. [read post]
2 Jan 2009, 3:00 am
In the end, the main reason for the decision to change systems was efficiency. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:30 pm
However, the Biden administration has seen FTC and DOJ management take a much harder and more skeptical line on the very idea that efficiencies could be beneficial in any antitrust context. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm
Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 911 F.2d 941, 958 (3d Cir. 1990); cf. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:55 am
State Net Operating Loss (NOL) Provisions As of July 1, 2021 Federal Conformity State Defined Carryforward Years State Defined Carryforward Caps Alabama 15 Alaska Yes Arizona 20 Arkansas 8 California 0 $0 Colorado Yes Connecticut 20 Delaware Yes Florida Yes Georgia Yes Hawaii Yes Idaho 20 Illinois 12 Indiana… [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Main San Gabriel Basin Watermaster (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 1165 [“Azusa”], which held that the existing facilities exemption “should not be construed to include a large municipal waste landfill” affirmed the trial court’s rejection of the County’s use of Section 15301 because (1) the 1998 amendments to the CEQA Guidelines did not modify Section 15301 to include landfills despite the agency’s awareness of Azusa, and (2) the finding in Public Resources… [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am
Main San Gabriel Basin Watermaster (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 1165 [“Azusa”], which held that the existing facilities exemption “should not be construed to include a large municipal waste landfill” affirmed the trial court’s rejection of the County’s use of Section 15301 because (1) the 1998 amendments to the CEQA Guidelines did not modify Section 15301 to include landfills despite the agency’s awareness of Azusa, and (2) the finding in Public Resources… [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Arkema Inc. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 10:58 am
In the United States (US), as for most developed countries,[6] trade policy and IP standards have consistently been linked, a pattern which can (at least partially) be traced back to extensive lobbying by senior management at US-based technology and pharmaceutical firms.[7] For example, since at least the 1980s, Pfizer Inc. has been involved in mobilizing other US firms and stakeholders to lobby US policymakers on the issue of international IP protection. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 11:48 am
How to Reduce Medical Debt by Checking for Mistakes on Your Bills So what are the main areas you need to check on when reviewing your medical bills and insurance submissions? [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:09 am
Mattel, Inc., 552 U.S. 576 (2008), failed to answer this question. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
Environmental Protection Agency has issued a compliance order to the Polidori Corporation, Inc. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:43 am
However, CA RIAs can avoid these additional requirements by engaging a PCAOB-registered auditor to prepare and distribute audited financial statements to all beneficial owners of the pooled investment vehicle, and the Commissioner of the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (“DFPI”). [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 1:52 pm
Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue: The main interest asserted by Minnesota in this case is the raising of revenue. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:48 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) charged two co-founders of Centra Tech, Inc., (Centra) a purported financial services start-up, with orchestrating a fraudulent initial coin offering (ICO), a term that is meant to describe the offer and sale of digital assets issued and distributed on a blockchain, that raised more than $32 million from thousands of investors. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:44 pm
INTRODUCTION On September 28, 2004, the United States Supreme Court granted a property owner’s application for leave from a Connecticut Supreme Court decision upholding the constitutionality of the community’s taking of property with the specified purpose of creating jobs by selling the property to a private industrial user.1 As the petitioner land owners in Kelo express in their brief requesting leave, the critical question for the Court to determine is whether a taking for purely… [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm
Finally, recent United States Supreme Court cases Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. [read post]
