Search for: "BENEFIT v. PFIZER, INC."
Results 41 - 60
of 201
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2007, 9:09 am
Pfizer, Inc., 2004 WL 2191804, at *6 (S.D. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:50 pm
We blogged about the highly suspect decision in Centocor, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 7:17 am
” Pfizer, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 10:23 am
Pfizer Inc., SD N.Y., CCH RICO Business Disputes Guide ¶11,779. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 8:03 am
The case, Pfizer v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 8:25 am
Pfizer would not be the new owner of the redeveloped land, but did expect to benefit from it. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
21 Dec 2006, 12:21 am
Pfizer Inc. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 11:14 pm
Pfizer, Inc., 361 F.3d 1016, 1020 (7th Cir.2004). [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:05 pm
Pfizer, Inc., 562 F.3d 163 (2d Cir. 2009). [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 10:37 am
That’s precisely the scenario that prompted the case of Pfizer Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 10:32 am
The Court distinguished Prohias v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Pfizer, Inc., 716 F.3d 1087, 1092-93 (8th Cir. 2013). [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
STERN v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 5:00 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 482 F.3d 1187, 1194 (9th Cir. 2007); Phelps v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:45 am
INPI (EPLAW) Lyrica (Pregabalin) – US: Patent infringement complaint filed following a Para IV certification: Pfizer Inc. et al. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 1:11 pm
After conducting “a comprehensive review of the risks and benefits” of Children’s Motrin, the FDA “agreed with the petitioners that the labeling of . . . [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 3:01 am
Pfizer Inc. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 4:23 am
Pfizer Inc., 2009 WL 3230611 (W.D. [read post]
