Search for: "BENEFIT v. PFIZER, INC."
Results 81 - 100
of 201
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Plough, Inc., 863 P.2d 167, 177-78 (Cal. 1993); Patton v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Plough, Inc., 863 P.2d 167, 177-78 (Cal. 1993); Patton v. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
In Panuwat, the defendant was an employee of Medivation, Inc., a mid-cap oncology firm that was resisting one hostile bidder (Sanofi S.A.) and encouraging another firm (Pfizer) to outbid Sanofi. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm
Pfizer, 196 F. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 10:16 am
Pfizer, Inc., ___ F. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 6:00 am
The NLDC wanted to redevelop an economically troubled neighborhood in conjunction with Pfizer, Inc., a major pharmaceutical firm that had set up a headquarters nearby and expected to benefit from the takings.The sad history of the project does indeed highlight some of the weaknesses of the Kelo decision. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 12:36 pm
Danek Medical, Inc., 1999 WL 1054864, *6 (M.D. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
The Decherts are too involved in this litigation to comment publicly.There aren’t many research-oriented pharmaceutical companies based in Alabama, and after last week’s execrable decision in Wyeth, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 4:30 am
Pfizer, Inc., 2015 WL 3999488 (E.D. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 6:03 am
PepsiCo, Inc. regarding whether use of another’s trademark in a marketing slogan is fair use. [read post]
21 Jan 2018, 12:00 am
In Patel v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 4:00 am
[v][v] In particular Hughes found the inventive concept was: “zoledronate is a useful inhibitor of bone resorption in rats a [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 12:57 pm
Thus, for diseases for which the causes are largely unknown, such as most birth defects, a differential etiology is of little benefit. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
Pfizer, Inc., 490 F. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 9:46 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Eloxatin (Oxaliplatin) – US: District Court New Jersey grants summary judgment of non-infringement in favour of Hospira, Teva and others concerning patent relating to Sanofi’s Eloxatin: Sanofi-Aventis v Sandoz (SmartBrief) (The IP Factor) (GenericsWeb) (Patents4Life) General Europe’s ever changing landscape… [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:22 am
Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:22 am
Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Pfizer, Inc., 153 S.W.3d 758, 761 (Ky. 2004); McCombs v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 12:22 pm
Pfizer Inc., 358 F.3d 659 (9th Cir. 2004). [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 4:07 am
Pfizer, Inc., 253 F.R.D. 11, 16-17 (D. [read post]
