Search for: "BLACK et al v. INDIANA STATE POLICE et al"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2009, 7:10 am
The case is Steinbeck, et al., v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 3:26 pm
State of Indiana )NFP) C.R.M. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 5:13 pm
" In Save the Valley, Inc., Thomas and Jae Breitweiser, et al v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 10:38 am
" Mary Ann Brown, et al. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:55 am
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes in some states induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 10:10 am
v=%CE%B1&r=04833355782549953; R. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes in some states induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 11:03 am
" Lake County Board of Zoning Appeals, et al. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 6:34 am
During his tenure with the Public Defender Service and in private practice, Judge Wilkins served as the lead plaintiff in Wilkins, et al. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:04 am
That case, from Indiana, asks the Court to interpret the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act of 2006, requiring those convicted of sex crimes to register with state and federal databases. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
The Keep Your Opinions to Yourself Award: Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita The Failed Sunshine State Award: Florida Gov. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 3:45 am
And the state needs to use resources to address its black market problems. [read post]
8 Oct 2011, 10:24 am
http://j.st/p5z Tactical Stop-Loss, LLC, et al. v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Click Here National Union Fire Insurance Company et al. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
§9601 et seq. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
§9601 et seq. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 9:08 am
Alcoa Inc., et al, Civil No. 2:10-cv-05051-GW (PLAx) (C.D. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm
Navistar had asked the United States Court of Appeals in Washington, D.C. to void those polices because they had been adopted by the EPA without the public process required by law, but instead following input only from the SCR engine makers. [read post]
