Search for: "BLOOMBERG L.P. "
Results 21 - 40
of 194
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2023, 3:59 am
Bloomberg L.P. 2023 WL 350565, the New York Court of Appeals recently accepted certification of a question on state law put to it by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, namely: Whether a nonresident plaintiff not yet employed in New York City or State satisfies the impact requirement of the New York City Human Rights Law or the New York State Human Rights Law if the plaintiff pleads and later proves that an employer deprived the plaintiff of a New York City… [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 6:52 pm
The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Monday settled with Bloomberg Finance L.P. over claims that the company made misleading disclosures relating to its paid subscription service BVAL, which provides daily pricing for over 2.5 million securities to more than 1,300 financial institution customers. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:01 am
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced settled charges against Bloomberg Finance L.P. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 5:00 pm
" While in Tenber Assoc. v Bloomberg L.P., a court found that imposing a charge of two times of the previously existing rental rate was "not an unenforceable penalty" when there was no evidence that such an amount would be “grossly disproportionate to the [landlord’s] probable loss. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 10:32 am
Daily News, L.P. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 5:29 am
The court remanded the Commission's order without vacating it (Bloomberg L.P. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 am
I filed a motion to unseal and oppose pseudonymity last week in Doe v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
In its decision the Appellate Division, citing Stone v Bloomberg L.P., 163 AD3d 1028, quoting Greenberg v Spitzer, 155 AD3d 27: "The elements of a cause of action for defamation are (a) a false statement that tends to expose a person to public contempt, hatred, ridicule, aversion, or disgrace, (b) published without privilege or authorization to a third party, (c) amounting to fault as judged by, at a minimum, a negligence standard, and (d) either causing special harm or… [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:30 am
In its decision the Appellate Division, citing Stone v Bloomberg L.P., 163 AD3d 1028, quoting Greenberg v Spitzer, 155 AD3d 27: "The elements of a cause of action for defamation are (a) a false statement that tends to expose a person to public contempt, hatred, ridicule, aversion, or disgrace, (b) published without privilege or authorization to a third party, (c) amounting to fault as judged by, at a minimum, a negligence standard, and (d) either causing special harm or… [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 3:34 pm
Copyright InfringementTweetsFair UseEffect on LicensingTweets: A Fair Use of Copyright That Bars This Suit? [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am
I'm putting up some excerpts from my new draft article, The Law of Pseudonymous Litigation, hoping to get some feedback. [read post]
4 Nov 2021, 5:37 am
I'm putting up some excerpts from my new draft article, The Law of Pseudonymous Litigation, hoping to get some feedback. [read post]
4 Sep 2021, 11:22 am
Reader Morris directed my attention to a Bloomberg L.P. article by Jared Dillian published as a Washington Post story. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 12:57 pm
Gallo Winery RL Brands, LLC CHEF IQ 88831911 Bloomberg L.P. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 9:21 am
Because respondent was "under no obligation to furnish [materials that he did] not possess" (Matter of Rivette v District Attorney of Rensselaer County, 272 AD2d 648, 649 [3d Dept 2000]; see generally Matter of Council of City of N.Y. v Bloomberg, 6 NY3d 380, 388 [2006]), the evidence submitted by respondent "utterly refute[d] [petitioner's] factual allegations" with respect to the cotton swabs in evidence box number seven, thereby "conclusively… [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 9:21 am
Because respondent was "under no obligation to furnish [materials that he did] not possess" (Matter of Rivette v District Attorney of Rensselaer County, 272 AD2d 648, 649 [3d Dept 2000]; see generally Matter of Council of City of N.Y. v Bloomberg, 6 NY3d 380, 388 [2006]), the evidence submitted by respondent "utterly refute[d] [petitioner's] factual allegations" with respect to the cotton swabs in evidence box number seven, thereby "conclusively… [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 9:21 am
Because respondent was "under no obligation to furnish [materials that he did] not possess" (Matter of Rivette v District Attorney of Rensselaer County, 272 AD2d 648, 649 [3d Dept 2000]; see generally Matter of Council of City of N.Y. v Bloomberg, 6 NY3d 380, 388 [2006]), the evidence submitted by respondent "utterly refute[d] [petitioner's] factual allegations" with respect to the cotton swabs in evidence box number seven, thereby "conclusively… [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 9:21 am
Because respondent was "under no obligation to furnish [materials that he did] not possess" (Matter of Rivette v District Attorney of Rensselaer County, 272 AD2d 648, 649 [3d Dept 2000]; see generally Matter of Council of City of N.Y. v Bloomberg, 6 NY3d 380, 388 [2006]), the evidence submitted by respondent "utterly refute[d] [petitioner's] factual allegations" with respect to the cotton swabs in evidence box number seven, thereby "conclusively… [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 9:21 am
Because respondent was "under no obligation to furnish [materials that he did] not possess" (Matter of Rivette v District Attorney of Rensselaer County, 272 AD2d 648, 649 [3d Dept 2000]; see generally Matter of Council of City of N.Y. v Bloomberg, 6 NY3d 380, 388 [2006]), the evidence submitted by respondent "utterly refute[d] [petitioner's] factual allegations" with respect to the cotton swabs in evidence box number seven, thereby "conclusively… [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 9:21 am
Because respondent was "under no obligation to furnish [materials that he did] not possess" (Matter of Rivette v District Attorney of Rensselaer County, 272 AD2d 648, 649 [3d Dept 2000]; see generally Matter of Council of City of N.Y. v Bloomberg, 6 NY3d 380, 388 [2006]), the evidence submitted by respondent "utterly refute[d] [petitioner's] factual allegations" with respect to the cotton swabs in evidence box number seven, thereby "conclusively… [read post]
