Search for: "BOOKER STEVENS" Results 21 - 40 of 151
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2008, 3:11 pm
  And Justice Alito's silence in this case is an especially notable component of the division among Justice still fighting over the Booker's meaning and impact (including Justice Thomas, who write again to attack the Booker remedy). [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 12:01 pm by Clare Freeman, RWS, WD Mich
Justice Stevens closes his dissent: "I had thought Booker dismantled the mandatory Guidelines regime. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 8:50 am
  The Sixth Amendment's impact: Given the Court's recent ruling in Cunningham and the affinity shown by Justices Stevens, Scalia and Thomas for the Sixth Amendment jury trial right, there likely will be at least one Rita opinion stressing the impact and import of the Sixth Amendment in post-Booker sentencing. 2. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 7:47 am
  It seems clear that Justice Kennedy still wants the Apprendi-Blakely rule watered down and that Justice Stevens likes the Apprendi-Blakely rule livened up. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 11:25 pm
Joining her were Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Stevens, Scalia, Thomas and Souter. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Stevens Professor of Law at Cornell University and co-author, most recently, of Beating Hearts: Abortion and Animal Rights. [read post]
25 Dec 2009, 7:57 am by Solomon Wisenberg
The Order is interesting for the light it sheds on the Shelnutt case and for the methodology resorted to by Judge Land to impose a Booker-based upward variance in the face of Guidelines Section 1B1.8. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 7:04 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005), particularly in light of the language in Justice Stevens' opinions at pages 240 and 278 and Justice Breyer's opinion in Booker at page 251. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
  We can identify the areas of the law that could change as a result of Justice Stevens’ departure. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 10:07 am
United States, --- U.S. --- , 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2465 (2007); see also id. at 2470-71 (Stevens, J., concurring) ("Simply stated, Booker replaced the de novo standard of review required by 18 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 11:35 am
  The appeal bespeaks a misunderstanding of federal sentencing law under the regime created by the Booker decision. [read post]
6 Sep 2006, 11:43 am
  His blog has been cited more than any other, 24 times in 19 opinions, including Stevens' dissent in Booker, according to Best's tally. [read post]
16 May 2007, 3:20 pm
Addition: Jan Crawford Greenburg also posted this entry on her Legalities blog saying that the Court should not be described as the "Kennedy Court" but rather that "it's the Roberts Court vs. the Stevens Court. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 7:05 am
In that concurring opinion, Justice Stevens notes that he did not agree with the remedial part of the Booker decision, but is now bound to it by stare decisis. [read post]
12 Oct 2006, 7:50 am
California, the latest in the Apprendi-Blakely-Booker line of cases--what I found most interesting about the arguments was the degree to which they reminded us of the steepness of the learning curves in the early years of the Roberts Court. [read post]