Search for: "BOOKER STEVENS"
Results 41 - 60
of 151
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Nov 2006, 3:56 am
Steven L. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 1:32 pm
Booker. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 8:35 am
The fact that both Justices Stevens and Thomas may be deeply interested in getting rid of Harris seems quite significant (and Justice Ginsburg has almost always voted with Justice Stevens in this line of cases). [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 2:46 pm
He has already won the battle fought with Justice Scalia in the Booker majority remedial opinion ("Booker II"). [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:57 pm
Writing for a 7-1 majority (Stevens dissented, and Alito recused himself), Justice Sotomayor said that Booker doesn’t apply here — the Guidelines are not advisory, and have to be applied as they were back in the bad old days. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:37 pm
United States (1998), over the dissent of Justices Scalia, Stevens, Souter, and Ginsburg. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 10:20 am
Booker in 2005 ([origin.www.supremecourtus.gov]) and Cunningham v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 3:33 pm
Justice Stevens wonderfully started to gravitate toward an offense/offender distinction in his questioning of counsel for the Government. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 8:20 am
Since Booker, this huge issue has been, for the most part, ducked by the circuit courts, which tend to view the post-Booker world as if Blakely and Apprendi never happened. [read post]
20 Sep 2015, 12:30 am
Green also uses Frederick Douglass and Booker T. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 9:40 am
Booker, supra, 543 U.S. at 284-85 (Stevens, J., dissenting in part). [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 8:10 am
King , Fred Cheesman & Brian Ostrom Why Sentencing by a Judge Fulfills the Right to Jury Trial: A Comparative Law Look at Blakely and Booker by Susan F. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 4:11 am
Jones, James Edward JR Olliges, recorded by Booker T. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 1:10 pm
Most of the sympathetic facts come from Justice Stevens’ dissent. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 11:43 am
Justice Stevens, the author of Gall, reveals yet again that he can give the defense bar lots of great dicta. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 12:01 pm
Stevens, 462 F.3d 1169, 1170 (9th Cir.2006).We do not need to decide which side of that circuit split we would join in order to resolve this case. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 12:54 pm
First of all, the facts are pretty amazing:The appellant, Steven A. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 12:52 pm
I am sure I have left out other post-Booker head-scratchers that will ensure there is lots to keep me and others plenty busy in the weeks and months ahead. [read post]
10 May 2010, 6:11 am
In other news, the DBR (John Pacenti) covers the debate about whether PSIs are really needed after Booker. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 1:46 pm
Congress has not acted since Booker to prohibit waiver of a presentence report. [read post]
