Search for: "BOOKER STEVENS"
Results 41 - 60
of 151
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2011, 11:56 pm
Though Marley Booker claims MAMA MARLEY does not refer to any living individual, Fifty Six believes otherwise, and it also takes issue with Booker Marley’s use of 9MILE and NINE MILE for music festivals promoted on its domain. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 6:07 am
Wilson and Steven Chermak Article first published online: 20 NOV 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00762.x Abstract PDF(33K) RESEARCH ARTICLE Community-driven violence reduction programs : Examining Pittsburgh's One Vision One Life (pages 993–1027) Jeremy M. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 12:37 pm
United States (1998), over the dissent of Justices Scalia, Stevens, Souter, and Ginsburg. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 9:20 pm
Steven Malanga of the always-interesting City Journal has published The Next Wave of Urban Reform: Mayors Cory Booker and Dave Bing fight to save two of America's most distressed cities. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 12:35 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:07 am
Booker, the first time a blawg was cited. [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 2:10 pm
Berman’s blog, here.Image of Judge Graber's chamber's door from http://abovethelaw.com/susan-graber/Steven Kalar, Senior Litigator N.D. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 11:51 am
’” In the Booker remedial opinion, the Court again used the language of Blackstone in describing the “great bulwark of [our] civil and political liberties” as trial by jury confirming unanimously the charges against the accused. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
”So has Stevens. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 1:50 pm
Justice Stevens, the lone but impassioned dissenter, believed that under Booker, courts faced with cases like Dillon’s should be able to reduce prison sentences below the amended Guidelines. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 6:22 am
In a lengthy dissent, Justice Stevens conceded that Dillon has no constitutional right to a sentence reduction under Section 3582(c)(2), but he would have held that Booker’s remedial holding does indeed apply to Section 3582(c)(2) proceedings because Booker abolished a “fixed, determinate sentencing regime based on mandatory Guidelines. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 1:10 pm
Most of the sympathetic facts come from Justice Stevens’ dissent. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 4:29 pm
Stevens, J., dissenting " ... [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:57 pm
Writing for a 7-1 majority (Stevens dissented, and Alito recused himself), Justice Sotomayor said that Booker doesn’t apply here — the Guidelines are not advisory, and have to be applied as they were back in the bad old days. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 12:01 pm
Justice Stevens closes his dissent: "I had thought Booker dismantled the mandatory Guidelines regime. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 7:48 am
Booker (2005). [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 1:32 pm
Booker, the Court has held that the right to jury trial applies to any fact that, even if not designated by the legislature as part of the crime, exposes a criminal defendant to increased punishment. [read post]
10 May 2010, 6:11 am
In other news, the DBR (John Pacenti) covers the debate about whether PSIs are really needed after Booker. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
We can identify the areas of the law that could change as a result of Justice Stevens’ departure. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 11:00 am
In other cases, Justice Steven held in Johnson v. [read post]
