Search for: "BOOKER STEVENS"
Results 61 - 80
of 151
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2013, 8:28 am
Image of Cunard poster from http://farm4.staticflickr.com/3243/3125825374_1cec14c579.jpg Steven Kalar, Federal Public Defender. [read post]
23 May 2007, 3:43 pm
Doug Berman has this post at Sentencing Law and Policy on the Sixth Circuit's decision in Birka, which highlights issues still in question after Booker and Blakely. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 12:35 pm
Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 6:59 am
The lack of appellate accountability plus the pro-guidelines language in the opinion could let those appellate courts that have clung to the Guidelines in the wake of the Court’s decision in Booker to continue to do so. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 6:07 am
Wilson and Steven Chermak Article first published online: 20 NOV 2011 | DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00762.x Abstract PDF(33K) RESEARCH ARTICLE Community-driven violence reduction programs : Examining Pittsburgh's One Vision One Life (pages 993–1027) Jeremy M. [read post]
27 May 2009, 1:30 pm
The majority included Justices Stevens, Scalia, Souter, Thomas, and Ginsburg. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 1:50 pm
Justice Stevens, the lone but impassioned dissenter, believed that under Booker, courts faced with cases like Dillon’s should be able to reduce prison sentences below the amended Guidelines. [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 7:53 pm
" Booker and Tribe are right. [read post]
2 Sep 2012, 10:18 am
v=-HNwzw3afCo Steven Kalar, Senior Litigator N.D. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 7:48 am
Booker (2005). [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 3:46 am
Justice Stevens wrote for the majority, joined by the Chief Justice and Justicea Scalia, Thomas, and Alito. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 5:12 am
Stevens, 2007 U.S. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:01 pm
EDITORS' OBSERVATIONS Steven L. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 12:34 pm
Justice Stevens, the author of Gall, reveals yet again that he can give the defense bar lots of great dicta. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 6:43 pm
Justices Stevens and Ginsburg, both essential votes for the extension of Apprendi in Booker, seem to be reluctant to extend it this far.My first read of the Ice transcript led me toward Lyle's assessment, but I have long given up making serious predictions about anything concerning what the Justices are going to be doing in the Apprendi/Blakely line of constitutional rulings. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 6:03 pm
I thought Ginsburg and Stevens were true Blakely believers. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 7:58 am
Three dissenters in Harris remain on the Court: Stevens, Thomas, and Ginsburg. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:11 pm
” [@FakeAPStylebook] Christopher Booker series on child-snatching by UK authorities [Telegraph: first, second, third] Tags: Child Protective Services, humor, Italy, Philip K. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 3:02 pm
Though I think it likely that President-Elect Obama will get to replace at least Justice Stevens in the not-too-distant future, it is almost impossible to imagine a replacement that will be as pro-defendant as Stevens has become on sentencing issues. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 5:15 am
Does an appellate presumption of reasonableness violate Sixth Amendment rights, as stated in Apprendi and Booker? [read post]
