Search for: "BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY"
Results 41 - 60
of 469
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Aug 2021, 12:27 pm
The proper jurisdiction for these suits, as the Seyfarth post notes, became open to debate after a US Supreme Court 2017 decision in Bristol Myers Squibb v Superior Court. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 9:58 am
By Lennon Haas and Noah Finkel Seyfarth Synopsis: Since the Supreme Court’s 2017 decision in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 12:07 pm
California Attorney General Rob Bonta today announced a $75 million nationwide settlement with global pharmaceutical company Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), resolving allegations that BMS underpaid the drug rebates owed to Medi-Cal and other state Medicaid programs. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 9:12 am
Four years ago, in Bristol-Myers Squibb v. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 9:12 am
Four years ago, in Bristol-Myers Squibb v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 4:15 am
., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Corning Incorporated, and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. filed amicus briefs. [read post]
17 May 2021, 1:12 pm
“And Trimble is headquartered in California, connecting California to Trimble’s claims, which is a consideration the Court in Ford found relevant in distinguishing its earlier decision in Bristol-Myers. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 5:00 am
Supreme Court’s previous rejection in Bristol-Myers of specific jurisdiction over claims by non-resident plaintiffs against a non-resident company whose product allegedly injured the plaintiffs. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 2:30 pm
APRIL 1, 2021, The United States Department of Justice settled a case against Bristol-Myers Squibb (“BMS”), a global biopharmaceutical company. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 9:45 am
How Bristol-Myers Squibb and other Pharma Companies Misrepresent Average Manufacturer Prices This week’s settlement resolves allegations that Bristol-Myers Squibb improperly calculated AMPs for many of its drugs in order to reduce the rebates it owed – and increase the share paid by Medicaid. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 5:56 pm
What is of particular interest to our readers is the Court’s re-emphasis of the meaning of Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2021, 11:33 am
With Specific Jurisdiction, the Court’s recent decision in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 12:25 pm
Among the blue-chip firms that participated in the 2021 survey were American Express, Anthem, Bank of America, Bristol-Myer Squibb, Capital One, Cigna, CVS Health, Eli Lilly, Glaxo Smith Kline, JP Morgan Chase, Liberty Mutual, Mastercard, McDonalds, Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi, Starbucks, United Health, VISA, and Walmart. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 2:28 am
This second appeal followed with Bristol Myers Squibb Co., Pfizer Inc., and Eli Lilly and Company, among others, filing dueling amicus briefs. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 12:19 pm
While it may seem straightforward, companies often struggle to prove they took reasonable steps to protect the information from disclosure. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 11:24 am
Last month, the Supreme Court denied certiorari in a case that would determine whether the Court’s 2017 decision in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 4:00 pm
Bauman,[4] the corporation’s association with the forum state must be “so continuous and systematic as to render the corporation at home in the forum state,” and under Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 5:00 am
Supreme Court opinions, the most recent of which was in the case of Bristol-Myers Squibb v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:05 am
Bristol Meyers Squibb appealed. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 5:39 am
The Court reviewed several notable United States Supreme Court Opinions, the most recent of which was in the case of Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. [read post]
