Search for: "BVS, Inc." Results 81 - 100 of 222
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2023, 1:44 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Herculito Maritime Ltd and others v Gunvor International BV and others, heard 14th June 2023. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 9:52 am
.* AV Preeminent and BV Distinguished are certification marks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 9:51 pm
There's a full-blooded critique of the Advocate General's Opinion in the soybean patent saga of Case C-428/08 Monsanto Technology LLC v Cefetra BV and others ("Purpose-bound protection for DNA sequences: in through the back door? [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 9:49 am
.* AV Preeminent and BV Distinguished are certification marks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 6:56 am by Rob Robinson
Those providers were: BAND 1 FTI Consulting Lighthouse BAND 2 Innovative Driven BDO USA LLP Deloitte EY iDiscovery Solutions, Inc. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 9:49 am
.* AV Preeminent and BV Distinguished are certification marks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 2:05 am by Gilles Cuniberti
The facts of the case were the following: 12 On 6 March 2009, Solvay, the proprietor of European patent EP 0 858 440, brought an action in the Rechtbank ‘s-Gravenhage for infringement of the national parts of that patent, as in force in Denmark, Ireland, Greece, Luxembourg, Austria, Portugal, Finland, Sweden, Liechtenstein and Switzerland, against the Honeywell companies for marketing a product HFC-245 fa, manufactured by Honeywell International Inc. and identical to the product… [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:42 am
Arnold J. reiterated his view (expressed previously in Teva UK Ltd v Gilead Sciences Inc [2017] EWHC 13 (Pat)) that the test in Lilly remains unclear. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 2:52 am by Wim Alberts
’” (page 31 – with reference to the well-known decision in Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: Keefe (by his litigation friend Eyton) v Hoteles Pinero Canarias SL, heard 7 Mar 2017 Arcadia Petroleum Ltd & Ors v Bosworth & Anor, heard 10-11 Apr 2017 In the matter of an application by Anthony McIntyre for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland), heard 24 October 2019 ABC (AP) v Principal Reporter & Anor (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 In the matter of XY (AP) (Scotland), heard 13- 14 November 2019 R v Hilton (Northern… [read post]