Search for: "Bad v. Smith" Results 81 - 100 of 1,482
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
This post is the first of four looking at the decision of Smith J in Lidl & another v Tesco & another [2023] EWHC 873 (Ch). [read post]
9 May 2023, 5:51 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
More Jaune Smith This conundrum leads to two broad types of judicial use of history in Indian law. [read post]
4 May 2023, 5:16 am by Daphne Keller
  The Supreme Court recognized risks of this kind in a 1959 obscenity prosecution against a bookseller, Smith v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 8:05 am by Eric Goldman
Ozimals * 17 USC 512(f) Claim Against “Twilight” Studio Survives Motion to Dismiss–Smith v. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 10:31 am by John Elwood
This post may have been fairly plain, but I just wanted to point out that at least I made it all the way through without any bad fish puns. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 2:37 pm by Gabriel Chin
Nevertheless, as the briefs in Smith v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The court opined that as probationary employee, Plaintiff "may be discharged for any or no reason at all in the absence of a showing that ... her dismissal was in bad faith, for a constitutionally impermissible purpose or in violation of law", citing Smith v New York City Department of Corrections, 292 AD2d 198. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The court opined that as probationary employee, Plaintiff "may be discharged for any or no reason at all in the absence of a showing that ... her dismissal was in bad faith, for a constitutionally impermissible purpose or in violation of law", citing Smith v New York City Department of Corrections, 292 AD2d 198. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Indian Americans Rapidly Climbing Political Ranks DNyuz – Maggie Astor and Jill Cowan (New York Times) | Published: 2/27/2023 Despite being one of the largest immigrant groups in the U.S., Americans of Indian descent in 20123 were barely represented in politics. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am by David Kopel
These handguns, from companies such as Ruger, Smith & Wesson, Springfield, or Glock, are the most common defensive firearms in the United States; under the Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]