Search for: "Baker v. State of Oregon"
Results 1 - 20
of 100
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
[Eugene Volokh] Bakers Lose in Oregon Case, But Wedding Singers / Painters / Photographers Might Win
28 Dec 2017, 10:26 am
See United States v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 10:23 am
” The case is formally known as Baker v Croslin. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 4:05 am
In Klein v. [read post]
1 Jul 2023, 7:33 pm
On Friday, in Klein v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industries. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 10:11 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 4:38 pm
This is a Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide for the State of Oregon. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 1:25 pm
Indeed, in Holder v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 4:39 pm
Humpty Dumpty in “Through the Looking Glass”), have the right to define words, assuming there is a need for them to do so.Court clarifies the definition of "tampers" as it is used in ORS 164.345(1):State of Oregon v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 7:17 am
New York, in which the Court struck down a 10-hour workday for bakers in New York City. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 2:52 pm
State of Oregon and Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon (Ceremonial Fishing and Harvesting) Block v. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:24 am
Mark Satta* Last month, Aaron and Melissa Klein, a couple who owned a bakery in Oregon, asked the Supreme Court to review a ruling from the Court of Appeals of the State of Oregon, which held that the Kleins had violated Oregon state law by discriminating based on sexual orientation when they refused to bake a custom cake for a same-sex wedding. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 10:04 pm
For example, the District of Oregon jury’s recent award of $305 million in Adidas America, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 9:59 am
Invoking language from the majority’s decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:42 am
Hodge – whether Oregon v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 4:29 am
” An editorial in Mail Tribune urges the court to review the case of an Oregon inmate who has challenged a state rule that allows criminal defendants to be convicted with a less-than-unanimous jury verdict, arguing that the rule “originated in attempts to limit the ability of minority viewpoints to sway jury verdicts. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 9:01 pm
Last week the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
26 May 2014, 9:01 pm
Four years earlier, in Baker v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 10:58 am
The court cited Baker v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 8:05 pm
In doing so, the court cited to an earlier Washington State case , State v. [read post]
