Search for: "Bank of America, N.A  " Results 141 - 160 of 414
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2015, 8:04 am
Justice Thomas delivered the opinion of the Court in Bank of America, N.A. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 10:38 am
  Shortly thereafter, however, Defendant Bank sent Plaintiff a letter stating his loan would be serviced by Defendant Loan Servicer and Defendant Bank sent Plaintiff another letter stating it was unable to offer Plaintiff a DIL. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 11:30 am by Richard M. Re
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard argument in Bank of America, N.A. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 7:00 am by Mary Jane Wilmoth
Bank of America, N.A., Banc of America Mortgage Securities, Inc., and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. f/k/a Banc of America Securities LLCCase number: 13-cv-00447 (United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina)Case filed: August 6, 2013Qualifying judgment/order: November 25, 2014 12/22/2014 3/22/2015 [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 7:08 am by John Elwood
Bank of America, N.A., 13-1416), would be the vehicle for resolving whether an order denying confirmation of a bankruptcy plan is appealable. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:48 pm
     The SCOTUS has accepted certiorari on two 11th Circuit decisions allowing second mortgage strip-offs: Bank of America, N.A. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:00 pm by John Elwood
Bank of America, N.A., 13-1416, which raises the same question and which the Court also considered at the last Conference, now appears to be held, presumably for Bullard. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 7:23 am by Maureen Johnston
Bank of America, N.A. 13-1416Issue: Whether an order denying confirmation of a bankruptcy plan is appealable. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 6:45 am by Jordan Bublick
Supreme Court granted Bank of America, N.A.'s writ of certiorari which will allow it to address the issue of lien stripping in chapter 7 cases. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am by John Elwood
Each petition presents the same question the Court recently declined to hear in Bank of America, N.A. v. [read post]