Search for: "Bank of America,N.A."
Results 1 - 20
of 414
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2019, 11:41 am
The post Who is Bank of America, N.A and Why are They Calling Me? [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 11:43 am
Bank of America, N.A. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Bank of America, N.A., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Jul. 31, 2013; pub. ord. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
Bank of America, N.A., ___ F.3d ___ (Mar. 2, 2018), a putative class action, the Ninth Circuit held that the National Bank Act did not preempt the plaintiff's UCL "unlawful" prong claim predicated on violations of Civil Code section 2954.8(a), as well as a provision of the federal Truth in Lending Act, both of which require payment of interest on escrow account funds. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 4:00 am
Bank of America, N.A., ___ F.3d ___ (Mar. 2, 2018), a putative class action, the Ninth Circuit held that the National Bank Act did not preempt the plaintiff's UCL "unlawful" prong claim predicated on violations of Civil Code section 2954.8(a), as well as a provision of the federal Truth in Lending Act, both of which require payment of interest on escrow account funds. [read post]
14 May 2010, 5:00 am
MBNA America Bank, N.A., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (May 12, 2010). [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 6:18 pm
Civil litigation — Default Judgment — Appellate review Appellants Leautry Dixon and Valerie Dixon were sued by Appellee Bank of America, N.A. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
Bank of America, N.A., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Jan. 25, 2013), the Court of Appeal (First Appellate District, Division Three) affirmed the trial court's order denying class certification of claims involving certain allegely improper bank fees. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 4:29 pm
” Consent Order Against Bank of America, N.A. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
MBNA America Bank, N.A., ___ Cal.4th ___ (Jun. 21, 2012), the Supreme Court held that the National Bank Act preempted a UCL "unlawful" prong claim predicated on violation of Civil Code section 1748.9, "a California law requiring that certain disclosures accompany preprinted checks that a credit card issuer provides to its cardholders for use as credit. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 6:00 am
Bank of America, N.A., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Jan. 21, 2009), the Court of Appeal (First Appellate District, Division Three) held that Labor Code "section 203 penalties may not be recovered as restitution under Business and Professions Code section 17203. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 11:28 pm
The following order dismissing the involuntary chapter 11 petition against Bank of America, N.A. was entered by Bankruptcy Judge Michael Romero (Bankr. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 5:00 am
Bank of America, N.A., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Nov. 21, 2011), the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Two) held that a UCL "unlawful" prong claim could not be predicated on alleged violations of the federal Truth in Savings Act (TISA), 12 U.S.C. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 1:21 am
Read a copy of the court's order here: http://blog.ch11cases.com/2011/06/read-order-dismissing-involuntary.html On Friday at about 5:00 p.m. local time, 34 individuals (from the court filings, it appears not represented by counsel) filed an involuntary chapter 11 bankruptcy petition against Bank of America, N.A. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 3:04 pm
Bank of America N.A., plaintiffs, on behalf of a putative class of “individuals of U.S. national origin and/or ancestry, as well as naturalized individuals,” sued Bank of America and other companies. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 12:52 pm
Bank N.A. and Bank of America N.A., in their capacity as trustees for 99 RMBS trusts. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
Bank of America, N.A., 57 Cal.4th 390 (2013). [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Bank of America, N.A., 247 Cal.App.4th 1110 (May 31, 2016), more than 200 plaintiffs from California and other states brought UCL and other claims against numerous lenders and loan servicers related to the handling of their home mortgages. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:00 am
Bank of America, N.A., 57 Cal.4th 390 (2013) (discussed here). [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Supreme Court put Bank of America, N.A. v. [read post]
