Search for: "Barnett v. York" Results 81 - 100 of 304
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jan 2008, 7:56 am
Randy E, Barnett (Georgetown) is first and begins by discussing Gonzales v. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 4:48 am
Barnett at Gun-Rights Showdown, who writes:"Today, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case of Heller v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 5:10 am by Randy Barnett
” But I think there is an existing constitutional doctrine already limiting the commerce power of Congress that does satisfy most of Orin’s competing considerations: the doctrine established by the Court in New York v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 12:37 pm by Randy Barnett
  As Judge Boudin wrote in Massachusetts v. [read post]
12 Jul 2014, 12:36 pm by Stephen Bilkis
However, in exercising the discretion to impute income to a party, a Support Magistrate is required to provide a clear record of the source from which the income is imputed and the reasons for such imputation based on Matter of Barnett v Ruotolo and Matter of Genender v Genender. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 8:52 am by Randy Barnett
(Randy Barnett) Todd makes an interesting suggestion in light of Peter Ferrara’s assessment (in The Anti-Cuccinelli Axis) of the Cuccinelli campaign: The Libertarian Party should emulate the Conservative Part in New York, and offer to endorse the preferable of the Republican or Democratic candidate. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 7:10 am
  Speakers include: Randy E, Barnett, Mark A. [read post]
19 May 2014, 12:04 pm
[For those wish to the long-form legal argument, the Pacific Legal Foundation briefs in Sissel v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 3:52 am by Edith Roberts
New York to Kelly’s case, then it may rule that she too is not allowed to give a pretextual reason (the bogus traffic study) for closing the lanes on the George Washington Bridge. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 6:52 am
Such “commandeering” was ruled unconstitutional in New York v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
ICYMI: Recent assessments of the Supreme Court's attempt to distinguish Korematsu from Trump v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 2:10 am
(Barry Barnett @ Blawgletter - 2/22/08)No recourse for the Injured (New York Times editorial 2/22/08)Supreme Court chips away right to sue (Newsday editorial 2/22/08)A Matter of Trust? [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 10:15 am
Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s majority opinion emphasizes in New York v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 6:05 am
A third trial, Barry Barnett of Blawgletter tells us, as the first had been for $150M in punitives. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 8:35 pm
"David Souter was shattered" (page 177), so Bush v. [read post]