Search for: "Bay Electric Company, Inc."
Results 41 - 60
of 124
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann, Inc. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
Welcome to Abbott & Kindermann, Inc. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 9:35 am
Defendants-Appellees Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) and Pacific Bell Telephone Company (Pacific Bell) own and maintain utility poles throughout the San Francisco Bay Area. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 8:36 am
It's also one of the fastest growing U.S. electricity sources. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 6:31 am
California – Regulators Investigating SDG&E for Potential Lobbying ViolationsSan Diego Union-Tribune – Joshua Emerson Smith | Published: 2/23/2017 State regulators said they are investigating San Diego Gas & Electric’s (SDG&E) efforts to influence the local adoption of government-run electricity programs, saying the company does not have permission to do so yet. [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 8:09 am
Charge filed by Electrical Workers Local 83; complaint alleged violation of Section 8(a)(1) and (5). [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 1:39 am
: Advertise.com, Inc v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Arkema Inc. [read post]
13 May 2015, 8:58 am
Petitioner Michigan Environmental Council (MEC) appeals by right from an order of the Michigan Public Service Commission (MPSC) granting the application filed by Detroit Edison Company (Edison) to implement a power supply cost recovery (PSCR) plan in its rate schedules for the 2012 metered jurisdictional sales of electricity, and for approval of its five-year forecast. [read post]
10 Jul 2006, 2:18 pm
Law Judge George Allemán issued his decision Jan. 19, 2006. *** Electrical Workers (IBEW) Local 429 and its Agent Nashville Electrical Joint Apprenticeship Training Committee (26-CB-4240; 347 NLRB No. 46) Nashville, TN June 30, 2006. [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
Maharaja Appliances (Spicy IP) Delhi High Court rules on section 8 and 47 of the Patents Act: Lack of disclosure under s8 = no interim injunction: Chemtura Corporation v Union of India & Ors (Spicy IP) (Spicy IP) Copyright access for the disabled and collaborative IP policy (Spicy IP) Bumpy road ahead – Indian government eases norms in tech transfer from overseas firms (Spicy IP) Israel Judicial Review Officer rejects request for summary dismissal and clarifies requirements for same… [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
In Monsanto’s motion to dismiss, the company alleged that the District failed to prove where Monsanto was obligated to respond or monitor for PCBs under its Stormwater Permit and where the District has been injured as a result of the alleged release of PCBs into San Diego Bay. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
Patent No. 7,934,770 entitled BICYCLE SEAT and owned by Tampa Bay Recreation, LLC. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
Patent No. 7,934,770 entitled BICYCLE SEAT and owned by Tampa Bay Recreation, LLC. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 8:56 am
Delaware Tetra Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
Environmental Protection Agency has issued a compliance order to the Polidori Corporation, Inc. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 12:18 pm
Delaware Tetra Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
EPA alleges that Oxarc, Inc. failed to update their Risk Management Program at least every five years. [read post]
