Search for: "Bell Helicopter Textron Inc" Results 21 - 38 of 38
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2008, 5:17 pm
Controversy erupted at Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Ltd. in 2006 when certain foreign-born workers were banned from working on ITAR-restricted projects - a move that violates Canadian human rights laws. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 7:01 am by Callan Edquist (US)
Bell Helicopters Textron Inc., 417 F.3d 450, 455 (5th Cir. 2005) (acknowledging that a cost-benefit analysis can weigh on the government’s decision to enter the case). [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 8:38 am by Lara
EA fights for its right to use Bell helicopters. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 5:39 am by jgabryno
These include $1.2 billion for Boeing CH-47 Chinook helicopters; $3.1 billion for different models of H-60 helicopters built by Sikorsky Aircraft, a unit of United Technologies Corp; and $2.7 billion for V-22 tilt-rotor planes built by Boeing and Bell Helicopter, a Textron Inc unit. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limited, 2016 FC 590, the court clarified that this limit applied across bifurcated proceedings. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 6:00 am
Among those mentioned are several sales tax cases that, through mid-January, have been set for trial or for hearing on a motion for summary judgment in 2008 (note that the following list is not inclusive of all such cases):  Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limitée, 2012 FC 113 citing Pfizer Canada Inc v Apotex Inc, 2007 FC 971, the Court said it is entitled to look at all the patents and other publications that a skilled technician would discover in a ‘reasonable and diligent search’ to determine whether the resulting ‘mosaic’ leads directly to the invention. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 2:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., 806 F.3d 335, 341 n.7 (5th Cir. 2015) (so noting), but this Circuit's view appears to be settled by Titan Holdings, 898 F.2d at 273.) [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 7:48 am by Richard Renner
Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., ARB No. 12-110, ALJ No. 2009-AIR-20 (ARB Sept. 19, 2012), the complainant had died and his widow filed a petition for review six months after the ALJ dismissal. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Pfizer Canada ULC, 2020 FC 1, at para. 42. [3] See Sections 27(3)(b) and 28.3 of the Patent Act, RSC 1985, c P-4 [4] Burton Parsons Chemicals, Inc v Hewlett-Packard (Canada) Ltd, [1976] 1 SCR 555 at 563 [5] Apotex Inc v Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada Inc, 2008 SCC 61 at paragraph 37, [2008] 3 SCR 265; see also Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limitée v Eurocopter, société par actions simplifiée, 2013 FCA 219 at paragraph 65;… [read post]
5 May 2015, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
Entitlement to punitive damages may be either in the first phase or the second phase (see Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limitée v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm by Bexis
Medtronic, Inc., 552 U.S. 312 (2008). [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 12:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., 806 F.3d 335, 341 n.7 (5th Cir. 2015) (so noting), but this Circuit's view appears to be set forth by Lord & Taylor.) [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am by Eugene Volokh
Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., 806 F.3d 335, 341 n.7 (5th Cir. 2015) (so noting), but this Circuit's view appears to be set forth by Lord & Taylor.) [read post]