Search for: "Bernard v. Does 1-5"
Results 81 - 100
of 154
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2014, 8:40 am
[He lists five of the "best known", which include just one IP case: Biogen Inc v Medeva plc [1996] UKHL 18, but mis-cited as [1977] RPC 1]. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
Bernard v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:13 am
Cooper, in his November 29, 2013 opinion in Travis v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 8:13 am
§ 31-5-233(b) (LexisNexis 2009). [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
[4] Guerin v. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 9:34 am
Novartis Grimsby Ltd. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 5:10 pm
Civil Action File Number 5:12-cv-00250-KKC, Perez v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:15 am
V. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 4:05 pm
Journalism and regulation There are no new PCC adjudications to report, but several resolved complaints including: Alexander Anderson v Press & Journal (Aberdeen), 8/02/2013; Dr Mark Bailey v Irish News, Clause 1, 07/02/2013; A man & a woman v Sunday World, Clauses 1, 3, 5, 07/02/2013; Hertfordshire Constabulary v Hertfordshire Mercury, Clause 1, 07/02/2013; A woman v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 3, 07/02/2013, A… [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:46 am
S 425(1) and (2) were considered to deal only with the enforcement of orders of one part of the UK within another part. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 11:05 pm
Cases here: http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/KeyMadoff546Cases-SDNY-2010-11.pdf … B-SDNY: Picard's common law non-fraud claims ag insiders for failure to supervise, etc, not preempted by NY Martin Act. http://www.bankruptcylitigationblog.com/uploads/file/PicardvsMadoffs-BK-SDNY-Lifland-9-22-11.pdf … B-SDNY: Wagoner & in pari delicto rules dont apply to insiders so Picard has standing sue them for common law fraud.… [read post]
10 May 2012, 8:52 am
May 8, 2012) – Southern District Magistrate Judge, Bernard G. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 10:01 pm
Justice Dollinger relied on Court of Appeals Judge Bernard Meyer’s dissenting opinion in Valladares v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 8:25 pm
Bernard, Tangipahoa and Assumption Parishes! [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 8:25 pm
Bernard, Tangipahoa and Assumption Parishes! [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:00 am
1. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:43 pm
Bernard, Julie AnnGustanski, John B. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
Although sections 27(1) and (2) of the Singapore Trade Marks Act (1998) are based on article 5 (1) a-b, EU Trade Marks Directive (Directive 89/104/EEC, December 21, 1988), the Court of Appeal chose to interpret the requirement of trademark use stricter than the European interpretation (which is to look whether the defendant's use is liable to affect the functions of the trademark). [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 7:49 pm
Bernard, Orleans, St. [read post]
