Search for: "Black & Decker (US), Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 74
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2024, 11:00 pm
The name BLACK+DECKER is located at the base of the steamer. [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 11:00 pm
The name BLACK+DECKER is located at the base of the steamer. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 12:46 pm
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., 2024 WL 939151, No. 23-735-cv (2d Cir. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
This past fiscal year, the Commission brought a number of actions charging firms for using employment agreements that expressly violated the plain language of the rule in various ways, including by: requiring employees to attest that they had not filed a complaint against the company with any federal agency;[7] or requiring employees to waive their rights to financial whistleblower awards;[8] or requiring departing former employees to provide notice to the company if they received a request… [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 1:27 pm
A similar fact-pattern previously led to a securities lawsuit against tool maker Stanley Black & Decker, involving similar allegations. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 3:00 am
Black & Decker (U.S.), Inc., No. 20-CV-4425-JMY (E.D. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 6:12 am
Two major recalls of tree trimming devices were issued by the United State Consumer Protection Commission (“USCPC”) on December 9, 2020, affecting over half-a-million devices sold by Fiskars Brands, Inc. and Black and Decker, Inc. under its Craftsman brand. [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 7:41 am
Black & Decker Inc., 643 F.3d 352, 358 (2d Cir. 2011). [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 9:41 am
However, when Christy attempted to enforce its patent against Black & Decker, the company turned around and petitioned for inter partes review. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:11 pm
Pepper Hilton Hotels Black & Decker Dunlop Tires IBM Braum’s Inc. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 4:12 am
The second opinion came in another patent case, SAS Institute Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 3:15 am
Yesterday the court added one case to its docket for next term, granting certiorari in SAS Institute Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 3:27 am
Applicant's Senior Engineering Manager averred that the three major headsets in the field make their headsets look visually different, so that each headset is identifiable by the look of the headset.Industry practice was a key factor in In re Black and Decker Corp., 81 USPQ2d 1841 (TTAB 2006), in which the Board found acquired distinctiveness in a design for a key head. [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 11:19 pm
Black & Decker (U.S.) [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 11:19 pm
Black & Decker (U.S.) [read post]
16 Oct 2016, 11:19 pm
Black & Decker (U.S.) [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 12:09 pm
Black & Decker (U.S.) [read post]
20 May 2016, 10:31 am
Black & Decker won a reversal of a PTAB decision:For the reasons stated in this opinion, we reversethe Board’s decision that claims 16 and 17 would have beenobvious and affirm its decision that claims 7 and 10would not have been obvious. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 12:47 pm
§ 542 (importing goods using false statements). [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 6:15 am
Black & Decker Corp. v. [read post]
