Search for: "Board of Law Examiners" Results 101 - 120 of 14,222
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2012, 2:50 am by V.D.RAO
In view of the decision of the Apex Court in Rohtas Industries, I have also examined independently, whether the circumstances pointed out by the Company Law Board existed or not and I am satisfied that they did. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 12:32 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
”) The issue was fully raised before the examiner, and these references were not again a patentability issue until after the Board reversed the examiner.When Habasit appealed the examiner’s decision, Rexnord was not barred from presenting this argument in defense of the examiner. [read post]
In a new paper, Interlocking Board Seats and Protection for Directors after Schoon, we examine how interlocking board seats propagated corporate governance change in the aftermath of a surprising change in law. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 12:56 pm by Eric M. Fraser
The decision in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 2:38 pm by Louis Leichter
Due to the Texas State Board of Dental Examiners’ more severe stance towards discipline, I strongly encourage any dentist subject to an investigation or disciplinary action to contact an attorney with experience in both administrative law and the representation of licensees before the Dental Board. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 11:40 am by Gene Quinn
The post Federal Circuit reverses Board on erroneous application of the broadest reasonable interpretation appeared first on IPWatchdog.com | Patents & Patent Law. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 6:58 am by Sander van Rijnswou
The latter requires that those involved be given an opportunity not only to present comments (on the facts and considerations pertinent to the decision) but also to have those comments considered, that is, reviewed with respect to their relevance for the decision on the matter (see Case Law of the Boards of Appeal, 8th edition 2016, III.B.2.4.1).The reasoning given in a decision open to appeal has to enable the appellant and the board of appeal to examine whether… [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 12:20 pm by Louis Leichter
  The processing of complaints filed with the State Board of Dental Examiners (“Board”) is governed by Chapter 255, Title 3, Occupations Code and Rules 107.00 through 107.103 of the Board’s Rules. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 1:17 pm
We addressed a number of challenges and examined our processes. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 7:30 pm by Mark Terry
Last week, the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (BPAI) reversed a Patent Examiner on the issues of hindsight and design choice. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 6:12 am
I've updated my previous post "Case law you can use: improper for Examiner to rely on the same structure  to disclose two separate claimed elements. [read post]
26 Dec 2021, 2:36 am by Rose Hughes
A lack of Boards of Appeal case law is of course understandable, given that it is generally not worth an applicant pursuing the matter all the way to appeal when their claims have already been deemed allowable. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 11:08 am by Francis Pileggi
It includes the following abstract: Abstract In our new book, Outsourcing the Board: How Board Service Providers Can Improve Corporate Governance, Todd Henderson and I change the conversation about corporate governance by examining the origins, roles, and performance of boards with a simple question in mind: why does the law require governance to be delivered through natural persons? [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 10:30 pm by ernst
Therefore, when read in context of the record, argument and relevant case law, the Board of Trade decision does not provide a basis for making the rule of reason the unstructured hollow core of antitrust law. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 9:20 am by Arnie Clarke
Arnie Clarke and Harriet CrawfordLate in 2018, Board 3.5.07 issued two decisions on appeals from Examining Division decisions, in which the length of the examination procedure was excessive. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 1:36 pm by Stephen Honig
  What do boards have to know about blockchain to discharge their fiduciary obligation to oversee their companies? [read post]