Search for: "Bommarito"
Results 61 - 80
of 113
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2017, 7:23 pm
Crowdsourcing Accurately and Robustly Predicts Supreme Court Decisions — By Daniel Martin Katz, Michael Bommarito, Josh Blackman – via SSRN “ABSTRACT: Scholars have increasingly investigated “crowdsourcing” as an alternative to expert-based judgment or purely data-driven approaches to predicting the future. [read post]
1 Nov 2015, 4:58 pm
Katz, Daniel Martin and Bommarito, Michael James and Soellinger, Tyler and Chen, James Ming, Law on the Market? [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 6:52 pm
Bommarito, Michael James and Katz, Daniel Martin, GPT Takes the Bar Exam (December 29, 2022). [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 8:08 pm
Bommarito II, Tyler Soellinger, James Ming Chen. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 1:14 pm
With the release of the more powerful GPT-4, Katz and Bommarito collaborated with Casetext to conduct the study again. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 5:15 pm
Coming at regulatory burdens from a different direction, legal scholars Michael Bommarito II and Daniel Martin Katz found that regulatory references in 10-K filings had increased 4X between 1994 and 2014 (after analyzing more than 160,000 10-K filings with the SEC). [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 11:43 am
“Three out of 20 is an unexpectedly high number of endoscopes failing a cleanliness criterion,” Marco Bommarito, Ph.D. and lead investigator, said in a news release from the APIC. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 7:00 am
Filed under: Conference Announcements Tagged: Artificial intelligence and law, Carl Malamud, Computational linguistics and law, Daniel Martin Katz, Emile de Maat, Law.gov, Legal data mining, Legal informatics conferences, Legal text mining, Michael Bommarito, Michael James Bommarito, Network analysis in legal informatics, Paul Ohm, Program on Law and Computation, Statistical methods in legal informatics, Workshop on Law and Computation [read post]
7 May 2010, 4:16 pm
Filed under: Applications Tagged: Computational Legal Studies, Daniel Martin Katz, Jonathan Zelner, Legal citation networks, Legal citations, Michael James Bommarito, U.S. [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 1:32 pm
Daniel Martin Katz, Michael James Bommarito, Tyler Soellinger & James Ming Chen, Law on the Market? [read post]
29 Aug 2015, 1:32 pm
Daniel Martin Katz, Michael James Bommarito, Tyler Soellinger & James Ming Chen, Law on the Market? [read post]
31 Jul 2009, 7:31 pm
At their blog, Katz & Bommarito highlight their recent work involving the graphical display of quantitative legal information, including visualizations of the U.S. [read post]
5 May 2010, 4:37 pm
--Bommarito and Katz, A Mathematical Approach to the Study of the United States Code, link. [read post]
10 May 2010, 12:45 pm
Filed under: Conference papers, Conference proceedings Tagged: Computational Legal Studies, Daniel Martin Katz, Free access to law, Law.gov, Legal scholarship, Michael James Bommarito, Public access to legal information, Texas Law.gov Workshop, University of Texas School of Law [read post]
7 May 2010, 4:37 pm
Bommarito II and Daniel Martin Katz, both of the University of Michigan’s Center for the Study of Complex Systems and the Computational Legal Studies blog, have posted the slides from their presentations at workshops related to the Law.gov legal open government data project. [read post]
30 May 2010, 4:47 pm
.; click here and here for 26 U.S.C.) by Michael James Bommarito II, Daniel Martin Katz, & Jon Zelner, all of the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, Center for Study of Complex Systems and Computational Legal Studies; DocBlocks and IBM Many Bills have been used to visualize topics in legislation, by the IBM Research Visual Communication Lab; CMap Tools have been used for the visualization of norms and related fields of law in legislation, by Felix Zimmermann of jurMeta and kjur.de. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 2:58 pm
Katz and Bommarito recently published the results in their article, GPT Takes the Bar Exam, and on this episode of LawNext, they join me to discuss why they did this experiment, how it turned out, and what it all means for the future of AI in law. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 5:11 pm
Bommarito II & Daniel Martin Katz , A Mathematical Approach to the Study of the United States Code, 389 Physica A 4195 (2010). [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 7:33 pm
In January 2023, Katz and Bommarito studied whether GPT-3.5 could pass the bar. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 11:34 am
Bommarito II of Computational Legal Studies: The Development of Structure in the Citation Network of the United States Supreme Court Measuring the Complexity of the Law : The United States Code The Structure and Complexity of the United States Code The Structure of the United States Code HT @LaNetscouade. [read post]
