Search for: "Borden, Inc.,"
Results 41 - 60
of 125
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2017, 6:02 am
., on Friday, October 27, 2017 Tags: Boards of Directors, Director nominations, Hedge funds, Institutional Investors, Proxy advisors, Proxy contests, Shareholder activism, Shareholder voting Not All TSR Incentive Plans are Created Equal Posted by Charlie Pontrelli, Equilar, Inc., on Saturday, October 28, 2017 Tags: Equity-based compensation, Incentives, Pay for performance, Performance measures, Say on… [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 3:00 pm
" Borden v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:12 pm
.'" Borden v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm
The claim against the first defendant, Google Inc, continues. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:23 am
To prevail at common law, the plaintiff must prove that it has goodwill in the mark or get-up; there has been a misrepresentation by the defendant that leads the public to think that his goods or services are those of the plaintiff; and the plaintiff has suffered damage by virtue of the representation (Per Lord Oliver of Aylmerton n Reckitt & Colman Products Ltd v Borden Inc.) [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 12:54 pm
New Albany, Indiana – Huber Orchards, Inc. of Borden, Indiana filed a trademark lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 3:57 pm
Jane Lambert Bhayani and Another v Taylor Bracewell LLP [2016] EWHC 3360 (IPEC) (22 Dec 2016) In Reckitt and Colman Products Ltd v Borden Inc, and Others, [1990] 1 WLR 491, [1990] RPC 341, [1990] 1 All ER 873, [1990] WLR 491, [1990] UKHL 12 discussed the elements of an action for passing off. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 2:44 am
In Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer Plc [2012] EWCA Civ 1501 Lewison LJ referred to Neutrogena [1996] R.P.C. 473 that:"...There is passing off even if most of the people are not fooled most of the time but enough are for enough of the time. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 6:25 pm
BORDEN DAIRY COMPANY OF ALABAMA, LLC., et al., Respondents. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 6:59 am
This post examines two decisions by appellate courts in Florida. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 9:34 am
American Learning Systems of Boca Delray, Inc., 857 So. 2d 986 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 9:15 am
Some exhibits (e.g. the original fabric from the leading non-identical artistic work infringement decision in Designers Guild v Russell Williams, which this Kat has still never seen) are going to be kept but others -- including the photos of the jif lemon and Borden ReaLemon in Reckitt & Colman v Borden) are going to be ditched, if they haven't already. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 4:25 pm
Examworks, Inc. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 12:55 pm
Jif Lemon Case Photos (from Reckitt and Colman Products Limited v Borden Inc. and others, [1990] UKHL 12).Because of the huge amount of these House of Lords records and briefs, we will be sending them gradually for reformatting and preservation while staying up-to-date with the microfilming of our regular material as well. [read post]
28 May 2015, 4:00 am
“Records management law” will be a necessary area of specialization because electronic records are as important to daily living as are motor vehicles, and are now the most frequently used kind of evidence. [read post]
26 May 2015, 10:46 am
Examworks, Inc. [read post]
18 May 2015, 4:34 pm
Source Wikipedia In Reckitt & Colman Products Ltd v Borden Inc [1990] 1 WLR 491, [1990] RPC 341, [1990] WLR 491, [1990] 1 All ER 873, [1990] UKHL 12, Lord Oliver said: "The law of passing off can be summarised in one short general [read post]
17 May 2015, 1:08 am
Three lemons: bad newsfor passing-off plaintiffsThe question to be decided at appeal was whether this reputation among a significant section of the public in the UK, in the absence of goodwill, was enough to form the basis of a successful passing off action where the remaining requirements of misrepresentation and damage in the classic Reckitt & Colman Products Ltd v Borden Inc [1990] 1 WLR 491 ‘Jif Lemon’ trinity of criteria were satisfied. [read post]
9 May 2015, 8:55 am
C-E Minerals, Inc., et al., Index No. 61024, N.Y. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 4:27 pm
Kitchin LJ referred to Reckitt & Colman Products Ltd v Borden Inc & Ors [1990] RPC 341 when explaining the three elements that a claimant must establish in order to succeed in such a claim at [33] and summarised them in [43] as follows: “[A Claimant] must show that he has a relevant goodwill, that the activities of the defendant amount to a misrepresentation that he has endorsed or approved the goods or services of which he complains, and that these… [read post]
