Search for: "Bose Corporation"
Results 41 - 60
of 114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2012, 6:51 pm
(The following post is contributed by Avirup Bose, who holds law degrees from the West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences and the Harvard Law School and is qualified to practice law in India and the U.S. [read post]
18 May 2012, 8:30 am
We all know that the CAFC in In re Bose Corporation jettisoned the TTAB’s “knew or should have known” standard for fraud set out in Medinol v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 2:38 pm
In Bose, in comparing WAVE and ACOUSTIC WAVE with POWERWAVE, this court found that the “presence of the root element WAVE, upon this court’s review, introduces a strong similarity in all three marks,” Bose, 293 F.3d at 1378, although in that case the goods were not identical, for the POWERWAVE product was an amplifier rather than a radio.ANDThere is a heavy burden on the newcomer to avoid con- sumer confusion as to products and their source. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 9:46 am
Confirmed as speakers at the symposium are: Françoise Roure, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Gregory Tassey, National Institute of Standards and Technology, United States Mark Morrison, Institute for Nanotechnology, United Kingdom Adalberto Fazzio, Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, Brazil Kazunobu Tanaka, Japan Science and… [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 9:46 am
Confirmed as speakers at the symposium are: Françoise Roure, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Gregory Tassey, National Institute of Standards and Technology, United States Mark Morrison, Institute for Nanotechnology, United Kingdom Adalberto Fazzio, Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation, Brazil Kazunobu Tanaka, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Japan Altaf Carim, Office of Science and Technology Policy, United States Herbert von… [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:04 pm
AFP Imaging Corporation, 101 USPQ2d 1188 (TTAB 2011) [precedential]. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 5:40 am
, 443 US 97 (1979), Bose Corporation v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 2:23 am
Federal Corporation, Opposition No. 91168556 (February 24, 2010) [not precedential]. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 11:38 pm
The TTAB has not sustained a single fraud claim in the two years since the CAFC issued its decision in In re Bose Corporation. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 1:58 am
Kirtsaeng (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) US Trademarks TTABlog Special Report: List of fraud claims sustained by TTAB since In re Bose (TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Decisions TTAB recasts genericness opposition, finds CHI merely descriptive of electric massagers (TTABlog) TTAB: Would you have abandoned? [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 6:50 am
The TTAB has not sustained a single fraud claim in the two years since the CAFC issued its decision in In re Bose Corporation. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 3:05 am
" As to fraud, the court applied the Bose fraud standard in reviewing the evidence and the jury's findings. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
” Aumtech i-Solutions was an Indian corporation with its offices in New Delhi, and the Boses were an Indian husband and wife. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 7:00 am
New York Times, Gift to MIT from Bose Founder Raises Tax Questions, by Stephanie Strom: The founder of the Bose Corporation, a privately held company that makes high-end audio products, has donated the majority of the company to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, the university said Friday. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
Internet service providers are corporations which can well afford the cost of setting up self-regulation systems of this nature. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 8:55 am
” In re Bose Corporation, No. 2008-1448 (Fed. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am
Haldex Brake Products Corporation (Docket Report) E D Texas: ‘Agreement to assign’ a patent is not, by itself, actual assignment: Gellman v Telular Corporation (IP Spotlight) E D Texas: Evidence of lump sum settlements lacking per-unit royalty is inadmissible: LecTec Corporation v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 3:16 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.October 12, 2010 - 11 AM: Bose Corporation v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
(Docket Report) District Court W D Wisconsin: Motion to stay pending the Federal Circuit’s decision denied in false marking case: Hy Cite Corporation v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 5:50 am
As part of his application package, he signed a declaration that confirmed that the joint venture had the right to use this mark and "to the best of his knowledge and belief, no other person, firm, corporation or association has the right to use said mark in commerce, either in the identical form or in such near resemblance thereto as to be likely . . . to cause confusion, to cause mistake, or to deceive. . . . [read post]
