Search for: "Bose Corporation" Results 81 - 100 of 114
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2009, 2:34 am
Besides the airline's own intellectual property, they also seemed to be licensees of others' intellectual property including licences to show movies and television programmes, as well as dissemination of sound recordings via their Bose ® headsets. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 3:00 am
It’s a jungle out there in corporate America. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 1:38 am
Albrecht-Piazza, LLC, Opposition No. 91190040, in which the Board required the applicant-counterclaimant to amend its fraud-based petition for cancellation in light of the CAFC's decision in In re Bose Corporation, Appeal No. 2008-1448 (Fed. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 10:36 pm
Of course, the catalyst for the webinar is the CAFC's recent decision in In re Bose Corporation, Appeal No. 2008-1448 (Fed. [read post]
11 Sep 2009, 6:31 pm
Microsoft indemnifies its big corporate customers, and so stepped in. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 12:53 am
Fido's Fences, Inc (Property, intangible)   US Trade Marks – Decisions CAFC reverses TTAB’s Bose fraud ruling, eviscerates Medinol: In re Bose Corporation (TTABlog) (TTABlog) (Intellectual Property Law Blog) (IPKat) (Patently-O) (Las Vegas Trademark Attorney) 9th Circuit finds in favour of Paris Hilton in her suit against Hallmark Cards for violating her right of publicity and using her THAT’S HOT registered trademark without… [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 8:32 pm
See In re Bose Corporation, Appeal No. 2008-1448 (Fed. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 5:20 pm by Sheppard Mullin
This ruling, issued in In re Bose Corporation, Opposition No. 91/157,315, 2009 WL 2709312 (Fed. [read post]
30 Aug 2009, 11:00 am
Hexawave, Inc., the Bose Corporation was no longer manufacturing and selling audio tape recorders and players when it renewed its WAVE trademark for use with several goods, including the tape recorders and players. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 8:39 pm
" In other words, any corporate officer accused under Section 141(1) of the NI Act has to: (1) be a person responsible to the company for the conduct of the business of the company under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956 and (2) be in-fact also a person in-charge of the business of the company. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:00 am
Chennai Live 104.8 FM asks the Madras High Court: Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd & Ors v Branch Manager, Muthoot Finance Private Limited, Chennai & Ors (Spicy IP) Bombay High Court: Use of inventions for government purposes: Garware Wall Ropes v A I Chopra Engineers & Contractors, Konkan Railway Corporation (IP Frontline) Beware Mumbaikers: The Slumlord’s Act could detain you for a year for simply buying a pirated DVD (Spicy IP) (At Last... the 1709… [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(IP ADR Blog)   Global - Trade Marks / Brands Business superbrands – Google scoops the latest poll (Class 46)   Global - Patents Innovation policy: the balance between standards and patent regulation (Intellectual Property Watch) IBM develops patent quality index tool (Competitive Info) Nichia and Seoul to end global LED patent wars (Green Patent Blog)   Global - Copyright The Commons video (Creative Commons)   Africa Egypt and Nigeria suggested for USTR… [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Spicy IP) Copyright in characters – III – Delhi High Court decision in Raja Pocket Books v Radha Pocket Books (Spicy IP)   Kenya Anti-Counterfeit Bill 2008 passed (Afro-IP) Kenya’s new anti-counterfeit legislation discussion (Afro-IP)   Kuwait Kuwait adopts international classes 42-45 (Kuwaitmark)   Macedonia New Industrial Property Law (Class 46)   Nigeria Court moves from Uyo to continue proceedings in New York in high-stake patent… [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 5:06 am
• Bose Corporation is cutting 1,000 jobs or 10% of its workforce. [read post]