Search for: "Bottling Group, LLCĀ " Results 81 - 100 of 168
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2015, 3:20 am by WIMS
 Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> AmerGen Energy Company, LLC v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 2:55 am
*****  PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATE Never too late 33 [week ending Sunday 15 February] –- Evoking Audrey Hepburn’s image is not OK in Italy | Reasonable royalty and moral prejudice: new reference to the CJEU | CoA for England and Wales on parallel importations in Speciality European Pharma Ltd v Doncaster Pharmaceuticals Group Ltd & Madaus GmbH  | The Logic of Innovation: Intellectual Property, and What the User Found There and Tritton on… [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
As Jeremy recounts, the group is open both to new judges joining its meetings and sponsors. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 1:15 am
 * Warner-Lambert v Actavis Mark 2, still at first instance: more on Swiss claims, Skinny Labels, and no StrikeoutDarren covers another Arnoldian decision in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWHC 223 (Pat). [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:20 am
 ******************************PREVIOUSLY, ON NEVER TOO LATENever too late 30 [week ending Sunday 18 January] -- Julia Reda’s EU copyright revolution | GC on trade-marketing bottle shapes in (T-69/14 and T-70/14) | IPKat and BLACA’s event on Sensory copyright | IP Cross-Border Enforcement | US Supreme Court in Teva v Sandoz | On-line copyright infringement in Spain | GC on the ‘Pianissimo’ trade mark for vacuum cleaners… [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:03 am
Valentina reports on two trade mark decisions (T-69/14 and T-70/14) that the General Court has just delivered as regards the chance to obtain a perpetual monopoly on the shape of a bottle of water -- two bottles, actually.* Sensory copyright : IPKat, BLACA team up for a joint eventJeremy informs readers that on Tuesday 24 February the IPKat weblog will be teaming up with BLACA to host an exciting meeting on sensory copyright. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 3:49 am by SHG
Copyright © 2014 Simple Justice NY, LLC This feed is for personal, non-commercial and Newstex use only. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:03 am
There are, however, some exceptions, like Nampak Plastics Europe Ltd v Alpla UK Ltd, where Birss J held that the proprietor of a very simple patent for a plastic milk bottle could not resist an application for summary judgment on non-infringement in respect of the claimant's bottle design. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 4:28 am by SHG
Copyright © 2013 Simple Justice NY, LLC This feed is for personal, non-commercial and Newstex use only. [read post]
Protected concerted activity: In Design Technology Group, LLC d/b/a Bettie Page Clothing, 359 NLRB No. 96 (2013), an upscale women’s clothing store terminated three employees after they created Facebook posts that related to their concerns of safety when leaving work at night in an unsafe neighborhood. [read post]
The first post was about a sales event for a new model and included sarcastic comments about the quality of the food (hot dogs, chips, and bottled water) being served at a marketing event for a luxury automobile. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
Brittenham and his company, Clean Energy Capital LLC, with paying more than $3 million of the firm’s expenses from its funds. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 9:16 am by Lebowitz & Mzhen
The Alpha Tau Omega Fraternity Inc. of Huntington, W.Va., Richmond Property Group Ltd., Travis Hughes (the man who attempted to shoot the bottle rockets), Marshall University Board of Governors, and Marshall University Interfraternal Council were all named as defendants. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 1:45 am by Gordon Firemark
  SONGWRITER’S FAMILY SEEKS ROYALTIES FOR “ON THE GOOD SHIP LOLLIPOP” Nashville Post:  http://nashvillepost.com/news/2012/6/21/famous_songwriter_s_family_seeks_royalties_for_on_the_good_ship_lollipop_others In other music industry news, Deborah Bush Gervash, individually and on behalf of the Estate of Richard Whiting, sued Warner Music Group in Nashville accusing the label of breaching a royalty contract first executed in 1936. [read post]