Search for: "Brady reed"
Results 81 - 93
of 93
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2010, 10:18 am
Law firms with blogs or lawyers blogging (Click link to go to list of blogs by that firm): Akerman Senterfitt Akin Gump Alston & Bird Andrews Kurth Arnold & Porter Baker & Daniels Baker & Hostetler Husch Blackwell Sanders Blank Rome Bracewell & Giuliani Brown Rudnick Berlack Israels Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck Bryan Cave Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney Carlton Fields Cadwalader Cozen… [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:05 am
In terms of salary reductions, we are starting to see the first cracks in the lockstep compensation model.To date, law firms that have cut salaries include:Akerman Senterfitt (-10% across the board) Allen Matkins (-10% across the board)Alston & Bird (-5K across the board)Baker & McKenzie (between 10% and 25% )Blank Rome (between 2% - 5% + 15K across the board )Brownstein Hyatt (-8.5- to 10%% across the board)Bryan Cave (10% across the board)Buchanan Ingersoll & Roone (5 to 10% across… [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 11:31 am
.; Kevin Brady (Chair, Subcommittee on Health); Sam Johnson; Devin Nunes; David Reichert (Chair, Subcommittee on Human Resources); Patrick “Pat” Tiberi; Xavier Becerra; Diane Black Earl Blumenauer; Vern Buchanan; Joseph Crowley; Danny Davis; Lloyd Doggett; Jim Gerlach; Tim Griffin; Lynn Jenkins; Mike Kelly; Ron Kind; John Larson; John Lewis; Kenny Marchant; Jim McDermott; Richard Neal; Bill Pascrell Jr.; Erik Paulsen; Tom Price; Charles Rangel; Tom… [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Kuehne, No. 06-3668 A conviction for drug- and firearm-related offenses is affirmed over claims of error regarding: 1) allegedly improper venue; 2) the definition of "use" under 18 U.S.C. section 924(c)(1); 3) jury instruction regarding proof necessary for conviction under section 924(c); 4) constructive amendment or variance of the indictment; 5) prosecutorial misconduct; 6) a motion for acquittal; 7) alleged inaccuracies in the transcript of proceedings; 8) propriety of police… [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am
John Elwood briefly reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
Branker, No. 07-17 Death row inmate's Brady claim was properly rejected where compelling evidence showed that the two women were murdered by the same person, and implicated him as that person. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 10:40 am
"] Late Friday afternoon, Judge Reed O'Connor of the U.S. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
App. 1990).External agency manuals - Brady v. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 9:15 am
Law firms with blogs or lawyers blogging (Click link to go to list of blogs by that firm): Adams and Reese Akerman Senterfitt Akin Gump Allen Matkins Alston & Bird Andrews Kurth Arent Fox Armstrong Teasdale Arnold & Porter Baker & Daniels Baker Hostetler Baker & McKenzie Barnes & Thornburg Husch Blackwell Sanders Blank Rome Bracewell & Giuliani Brown Rudnick Berlack Israels … [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
To view these cases distributed by Findlaw.com you must first sign in to Findlaw.com. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
Mitchell, No. 02-3505 Denial of a petition for habeas relief in a death penalty case is reversed where: 1) a state court applied the Strickland standard in an objectively unreasonable manner for purposes of claims that petitioner's counsel were ineffective in preparing for the sentencing phase of his trial; 2) the state court unreasonably determined that the alleged errors of trial counsel did not prejudice petitioner's case; and 3) a state court erroneously evaluated a Brady… [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 2:51 am
In terms of salary reductions, we are starting to see the first cracks in the lockstep compensation model.To date, law firms that have cut salaries include:Akerman Senterfitt (-10% across the board) Allen Matkins (-10% across the board)Alston & Bird (-5K across the board)Baker & McKenzie (between 10% and 25% )Blank Rome (between 2% - 5% + 15K across the board )Brownstein Hyatt (-8.5- to 10%% across the board)Bryan Cave (10% across the board)Buchanan Ingersoll & Roone (5 to… [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
The Interplay between the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause and the Fifth Amendment’s Takings Clause: Is the Supreme Court’s Test for “Public Use” Merely Rational Basis? [read post]
