Search for: "Brent Kerr" Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2009, 2:14 pm
Held: Following Kerr v Department for Social Development [2004] 4 All ER 385, "the distribution of benefits is different from many other areas of civil law. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 6:45 am by Jay Willis
At the Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr covers yesterday’s denial of cert. in McCane v. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:45 pm by Molly Runkle
Coverage of the opinion comes from Amy Howe for this blog, Lydia Wheeler of The Hill, Lawrence Hurley of Reuters, Richard Wolf of USA Today, Brent Kendall of The Wall Street Journal, Sam Hananel of the Associated Press, and Greg Stohr of Bloomberg, with commentary coming from Orin Kerr for The Volokh Conspiracy. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage comes from Andrew Chung at Reuters and from AnnaMaria Andriotis and Brent Kendall in The Wall Street Journal. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:55 am by Kiran Bhat
Brent Kendall of the Wall Street Journal also has coverage. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:15 pm by Thomas Hopson
 Other early coverage comes from Brent Kendall of The Wall Street Journal, Adam Liptak of The New York Times, Robert Barnes of The Washington Post, David Savage of the Los Angeles Times, Gerry Smith at The Huffington Post, Daniel Fisher at Forbes, Michael B. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:20 am by Kiran Bhat
Jonathan Stempel of Reuters, Orin Kerr at the Volokh Conspiracy, and Adam Liptak of The New York Times preview tomorrow’s arguments in Florida v. [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am by NL
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1 v) the deceased person… [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 2:50 am by NL
(The Knowsley argument, paralleling the finding on assured tenants on Knowsley Housing Trust v White, link to our report) ii) Brent v Knightley was wrongly decided, such that the right to apply under s.85 Housing Act 1985 survived the (ex) tenant's death iii) Such a right to apply is a possession under article 1, Protocol 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights iv) To hold that the right to apply did not survive death would be in breach of Art 1 Protocol 1 v) the deceased person… [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 3:43 am by Amy Howe
  Other coverage comes from Nina Totenberg of NPR, Brent Kendall and Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal, Alison Sacriponte of JURIST, Joan Biskupic of Reuters, and Ben Winslow of Fox13 (who focuses on events in Utah). [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by Conor McEvily
Levey;  USA Today; the Associated Press; Jess Bravin, Janet Adamy, and Brent Kendall of the Wall Street Journal; the New Republic; NPR; ABC News (here and here); the National Law Journal; McClatchy Newspapers; the Atlantic; New York Magazine; Slate; Forbes; MSNBC; Politico; ACSblog; Orin Kerr, Ilya Somin, and David Bernstein of the Volokh Conspiracy; Constitutional Law Prof Blog; Salon; Balkinization; Blog of the Legal Times; and Concurring Opinions. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 2:37 pm by Pace Law School Library
Resources J. 721-759 (2010).Gardner, Alison, David Sewell and Brent Stahl. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 10:36 am
  There's some meaningful analogy in all this, no doubt, but I haven't clue what it is.And almost too trivial to mention, Volokh Conspirators Orin Kerr and Paul Cassell are mud-wrestling over how the exclusionary rule plays with originalists. [read post]