Search for: "Bridgeport Music"
Results 41 - 60
of 127
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2007, 9:12 pm
Good Copy Bad Copy: Good Copy Bad Copy June 1st, 2007 Is copyright really empowering music? [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 4:48 am
Othewise, I’d lose all the leverage I have with the existence, as yet undisputed in case law, of the decisions in Grand Upright Music and Bridgeport Music. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 11:20 am
The Sixth Circuit did, however, reverse and remand the judgment due to the excessive punitive damages award and the inclusion of prejudgment and compound interest in the compensatory award.More detail of Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 6:26 am
" In Bridgeport Music, Inc. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 12:45 pm
WB Music Corp. after the jump. [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 6:20 am
This analysis is complicated by the fact that current copyright law, at least under the Sixth Circuit’s reasoning in Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:00 am
Considering the adverse decision regarding Bridgeport v. [read post]
14 Jun 2008, 6:39 pm
Supreme Court (Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 2:33 pm
The Plaintiff are seeking declaratory judgment that their song “Blurred Lines” does not infringe on the song “Sexy Ways” by the Funkadelics (owned by Bridgeport Music, Inc.) nor “Got To Give It Up” by Marvin Gaye (owned by heirs of Marvin Gaye) (collectively “Defendants”). [read post]
22 May 2013, 3:17 pm
” In 1976, Tilmon assigned all of his rights to the song to Bridgeport Music. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 12:36 pm
Bridgeport v. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 7:45 am
And just exactly what is the Sixth Circuit’s radical holding in Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 7:18 am
Rock on the River, Inc. et al – United States District Court – Western District of Wisconsin – December 29th, 2017) involves an assault that occurred at a music festival in Bridgeport, Wisconsin. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 9:14 am
However, the district court's assessment of the various factors was not an abuse of discretion, and the court therefore affirmed the award.More detail of Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 7:22 am
In the wake of the Sixth Circuit’s Bridgeport Music decision in 2005, even minor background samples may be grounds for infringement. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 6:18 am
And to keep our sense of humor even amid a crisis, I’ll close out our music theme for the week. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 2:03 pm
He covers the litigation crusade of Bridgeport Music, Inc., which holds "portfolios of old rights (sometimes accumulated in dubious fashion) and use[s] lawsuits to extort money from successful music artists for routine sampling, no matter how minimal or unnoticeable. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 5:29 pm
Ciccone that copyright law’s “de minimis” doctrine does in fact apply to music sampling was a long overdue departure from the Sixth Circuit’s 2005 Bridgeport Music decision. [read post]
2 May 2015, 1:47 am
The Appeals Court decision in Blurred Lines is keenly awaited by many.More on Billboard here , Williams v Bridgeport Music, Inc, No. 13-06004 (C.D. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 5:09 pm
Bridgeport Music, I believe, has already noticed this issue. [read post]
