Search for: "Broadcast Music, Inc. et al"
Results 21 - 40
of 119
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2021, 7:14 am
In a landmark decision, in Bell Media Inc. et al. v. [read post]
29 May 2021, 7:14 am
In a landmark decision, in Bell Media Inc. et al. v. [read post]
29 May 2021, 7:14 am
In a landmark decision, in Bell Media Inc. et al. v. [read post]
29 May 2021, 7:14 am
In a landmark decision, in Bell Media Inc. et al. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 2:11 pm
The impact of targeting on advertising prices was addressed by Marotta, et al., in 2019.3 The researchers noted the difficulties in trying to arrive at a definitive answer via empirical means about the economic value added by browser cookies owing to a number of factors. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 3:45 pm
That resulted in the landmark 2015 SCC ruling in Canadian Broadcasting Corp. v. [read post]
10 May 2020, 3:15 am
NEUTRON HOLDINGS, INC., Dist. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
Google Inc. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Doug Collins and Hakeem Jeffries said that their Music Modernization Act would "bring music licensing its first meaningful update in almost 20 years". [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 8:00 am
Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc. et al, case number 2:18-cv-01435, filed in the United States District Court Central District of California, claimed the two works were "in many ways identical". [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 5:00 am
For example, he argued that peer-to-peer (P2P) file sharing of music actually benefitted the music industry in an attempt to thwart legislative intervention to reform the Copyright Act. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 10:53 am
Vancouver Career College (Burnaby) Inc., 2017 BCCA 41 Argos Limited v Argos Systems Inc. [2017] EWHC 231 (ch) Technology Contracting Business Development Bank of Canada v Experian Canada Inc, 2017 ONSC 1851 SAP UK Ltd v Diageo Great Britain Ltd [2017] EWHC 189 (TCC) (16 February 2017) Barry Sookman SAP wins major lawsuit based on indirect use and named user license terms: SAP v Diageo Atos v Sapient, 2016 ONSC 6852 C&S Associates UK Ltd v Enterprise Insurance Company… [read post]
3 May 2017, 11:03 am
I argue that consumer confusion has to be considered in the second prong of the Rogers Test.See Twentieth Century Fox Tel., et al v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 11:03 am
I argue that consumer confusion has to be considered in the second prong of the Rogers Test.See Twentieth Century Fox Tel., et al v. [read post]
8 Apr 2017, 3:20 am
(iTVBox.net), 2016 FC 612 aff’d Wesley dba MTLFREETV.com v Bell Canada et al 2017 FCA 55 case in which an interlocutory injunction was granted to restrain the sale of Kodi boxes that were configured to enable members of the public to illegally access streamed content.[1] CarGurus also claimed it’s copying and making the photos available without consent was a fair dealing. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 11:55 am
The Australian has published a series of articles against implementation of the safe harbour rule, arguing that Google et al. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am
If you have been following the machinations by the Obama Justice Department [sic] over amending the ASCAP and BMI consent decrees, you may have found yourself wondering who was responsible for rejecting the good faith efforts of the songwriting community in favor of a cynical back room deal with multinational tech companies and broadcasters. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am
And finally Eleonora updated on the CJEU's decision in Case C-279/13 C More Entertainment where the CJEU said that live broadcasts are not communication to the public within InfoSoc Directive, but Member States can protect them: "[The Information Society] [D]irective provides that broadcasting organizations may prohibit the provision to the public fixations of their broadcasts [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 3:49 am
SiriusXM has won a rare victory over its use of pre-1972 recorded music in the satellite radio broadcasters' ongoing battle with Flo & Eddie, founders of The Turtles. [read post]
