Search for: "Brown v. CIR, Law Offices, LLP"
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2024, 10:06 am
In Brown Goldstein Levy LLP v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
Lewis, of Hamberger & Weiss LLP. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am
China The Fei Chan Dao blog has published a translation of a Notice expelling Zhang Guilin, Former Director of the State-Owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the Beijing People’s Government, from the Party and Public Office for “serious violations of discipline and law. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 5:23 pm
Escobar (5th Cir. 2020) (affirming dismissal of the political retaliation claims of a Crime Victim Unit Coordinator because she "represented the DA's office to crime victims" and to "other members of the law enforcement community"); Hagan v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 4:25 am
Dhingra, 371 F.3d 557, 559 n.3 (9th Cir. 2004)). [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
”[15] Moreover, in response to the Commission’s 2010 guidance dozens of major law firms counseled clients regarding their climate-change related disclosure obligations under the securities laws.[16] Although law firm memoranda on that subject were often signed by former or future Commission officials, and many described policy objections to the guidance in detail, sophisticated coun [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
” The withheld material included “TRIG specific model questions that USCIS immigrations officers should ask” and “follow-up questions that immigration officers should ask when they spot issues. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:00 pm
Recovery Corp. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2020, 9:46 am
Law Offices of Curtis v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 1:21 pm
& Forestry Co., 834 F.3d 589, 593 (6th Cir. 2016) (citing Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 4:30 am
See, e.g., Brown Bag Software, 960 F.2d at 1473–74 (relying on expert testimony to identify the objective points of comparison among different computer software programs); Swirsky v. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 4:48 pm
Kings County, 532 F.2d 655 (9th Cir. 1975) (held that P.L. 280 did not grant land use jurisdiction to States or Counties); Segundo v. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
In Vine v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 7:34 am
Cir. 2000). [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:35 pm
Cir. 2008). [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Brown] for check numbers [1001], [1002] and [1003]. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 8:16 am
Cir. 1999), the D.C. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 6:45 am
, Brown v. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm
McDade, Balch & Bingham, LLP & Jason Brent Tompkins, Balch & Bingham, LLP, pro hac vice.ORDER AND REASONSMARTIN L. [read post]
12 Nov 2017, 12:25 pm
McDade, Balch & Bingham, LLP & Jason Brent Tompkins, Balch & Bingham, LLP, pro hac vice.ORDER AND REASONSMARTIN L. [read post]
