Search for: "Brown v. Clarke" Results 161 - 180 of 485
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Dec 2014, 2:36 pm by CJLF Staff
Attorney General Eric Holder's handing of the Michael Brown shooting. [read post]
22 Jul 2008, 5:06 pm
Meal and rest break requirements clarified in Brinker v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:02 pm by JB
The closest Justice Thomas comes is citing to Clark v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
Supreme Court during the Court’s 1953-54 Term and was in the courtroom on May 17, 1954, when Chief Justice Warren read the unanimous decision in Brown v. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:30 am by Daniel Sokol
Lord Brown at [115] comments, philosophically: ‘contrary to widespread popular misconception, acquittal does not prove the defendant innocent’. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 12:42 pm by Nicholas Gibson, Matrix.
It will be for the seven Justices (Lords Phillips, Hope, Rodger, Lady Hale, Lords Brown and Clarke, and Sir John Dyson SCJ) hearing the appeals in these two parallel cases finally to determine the relationship of the Upper Tribunal to the courts in England and in Scotland respectively and, thus, whether the English and Scottish stories shall share the same ending. [read post]
13 Oct 2013, 8:45 am by Ilya Somin
These include the reality that most blacks and virtually all women were excluded from the political processes that produced the original meaning of the most important parts of the Constitution, the claim that Brown v. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:13 pm by Blog Editorial
The three linked appeals, Scottish Widows plc v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland), Scottish Widows plc No.2 v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Scotland) and Scottish Widows plc (Respondent) v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, will be heard in the Supreme Court this week by Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Neuberger and Lord Clarke. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 4:12 am by Blog Editorial
The two appeals in the Privy Council this week are to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Sir Patrick Coghlin. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 7:09 am by Maxwell Kennerly
Jaffe, a partner at Brown, Paindiris & Scott in Hartford and an expert on personal injury cases, said that Tacopina and Slager must be able to show that Yale had information that indicated Clark was dangerous. [read post]