Search for: "Brown v. Steward" Results 1 - 20 of 27
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2009, 1:20 pm
In 2007, in a case named Steward v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 10:56 am
The question whether a person is a “worker” is to be determined by reference to the principles laid down by the Court of Justice set out above, which exclusively define a worker (see, for example, Brown v Secretary of State for Scotland Case 197/86 at [22]). [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 10:27 pm by Martin Osborne
If you have any questions regarding the matters raised in this article, please contact the authors. [1] CCIG Investments Pty Ltd v Schokman [2023] HCA 21 at [4]-[6]. [2] Ibid at [12], citing Bugge v Brown (1919) 26 CLR 110 at 118; New South Wales v Lepore (2003) 212 CLR 511 at 589 [223]; Sweeney v Boylan Nominees Pty Ltd (2006) 226 CLR 161 at 173 [33]; Prince Alfred College Inc v ADC (2016) 258 CLR 134 at 148 [40]. [3] Ibid at [14]. [4] Schokman… [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 6:00 am
Arguing that this practice leads to judges hesitant to make unpopular decisions, the former justice advocated for a universally merit-based system of judicial appointments, pointing out that landmark decisions like Brown v. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 4:16 am by SHG
This could well be the most consequential decision of the Supreme Court since Brown v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 5:21 am by charonqc
She also wore a Gordon Brown facemask which she later shared with others. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 4:00 pm by Dan Markel
Richard Kluger, Simple Justice: The History of Brown v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 1:07 pm by Ron Friedmann
Bernard, US Litigation Professional Support Lawyer, Mayer Brown LLPSamuel Whitman, Global Knowledge Management, Mayer Brown LLPMoneyball for litigation If you think a process map as metadata is a stretch too far, then Moneyball for Litigation is for you. [read post]
19 Dec 2020, 1:11 am by Tessa Shepperson
July Justin Bates wrote a post for us on a new case, Jarvis v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 10:51 am by Dennis Hirsch
Scarlet that ISPs may not be asked to filter content to protect copyright, and its landmark decision in Google v. [read post]