Search for: "Brown v. The National Football League" Results 1 - 20 of 37
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2024, 1:01 pm by Todd H. Lebowitz
A venomous red-bellied black snake was spotted on the field at an Australian Football League Women’s match earlier this year, causing an understandable delay. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
In American Needle, the Court stripped the National Football League of Section 1 immunity by holding that the NFL is not entitled to the single entity defense under Copperweld and instead, its conduct must be analyzed under the “flexible” rule of reason.[25] And last year, in NCAA v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:42 pm by Patricia Hughes
Canada (Attorney General) and National Football League, et al. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2019, 4:40 am
Companies notified included the Australian Football League, which uses the flag on football jerseys in its Indigenous rounds, as well as ‘Spark Health’, an Aboriginal-owned and run social enterprise company which produces shirts bearing the flag. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am by msatta
In Whole Foods Judge Kavanaugh evidently found it amazing that the government would challenge a merger of firms controlling 300 supermarkets out of the 34,000 in the nation. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 4:00 am by Sean Vanderfluit
In doing so, the court stated that this appeal would be heard along with appeals from the decisions in National Football League, et al. v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 10:38 am by Anthony Gaughan
Shortly thereafter the National Football League approved the relocation of the Oakland Raiders to Las Vegas, beginning in 2019. [read post]
It sent a number of employment-related bills to Governor Brown for consideration by his October 11, 2015 deadline to sign or veto the bills. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 3:43 am by Nassiri Law
A spokesperson for the National Football League has sidestepped the issue, saying the league isn’t responsible for management of cheerleaders’ employment. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
Midland National Life Insurance Co., 199 F.R.D. 448, 451 (D.R.I. 2001).In the Second Circuit, “ascertainability of the class is an issue distinct from the predominance requirement for a (b)(3) class. [read post]