Search for: "Burgess v. Cooper" Results 21 - 29 of 29
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Apr 2010, 11:17 am by Anna Christensen
O’Brien and Burgess (08-1569) Argued: Feb. 23, 2010 Issue: Whether the mandatory minimum sentence enhancement under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 4:40 pm by Tom Goldstein
O'Brien & Burgess Docket: 08-1569 Argument date: February 23, 2010 Question presented: In a federal gun case, does the judge decide whether the gun was a machine gun by a preponderance of the evidence, or must the jury find that beyond a reasonable doubt? [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
— Richard Burgess, The Advocate, October 29, 2009 The city has agreed to build a new sewage treatment system that utilizes wetlands to clean wastewater and pay a $50,000 penalty to end a 9-year-old federal Clean Water Act lawsuit, according to court documents. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 7:02 am
O'Brien and Burgess Issue: Whether the mandatory minimum sentence enhancement under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 5:13 pm
O'Brien and Burgess Issue: Whether the mandatory minimum sentence enhancement under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 3:09 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Khan & Ors v R [2008] EWCA Crim 531 (14 March 2008) Burgess, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 516 (08 February 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Manchester City Council v Benjamin [2008] EWCA Civ 189 (13 March 2008) High Court (Chancery Division) Experience Hendrix LLC & anor v Times Newspapers Ltd [2008] EWHC 458 (Ch) (11 March 2008) Stow & Ors v Stow & Ors [2008] EWHC 495 (Ch) (14… [read post]